On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:37 AM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yeah, but the issues are all with me :) Please accept my apologies for > letting it slip through the cracks. No apologies needed! It is not an important patch -- I just thought it would be better to have the "base logo" merged before the "derived one". > Looking at it now, though, I hesitate to add the logo (and another > COPYING file) in the top-level Documentation directory - I'd really > rather people not have to pick through a bunch of unrelated stuff to > find the actual docs they want. I'd recommend we make a > Documentation/images (or .../assets or whatever) and put things like > logos there. Yeah, makes sense to avoid dumping things in the top-level directory. > Disagree? If not, could I get a version of the patch that does that? I > promise not to set on it for three months this time... +1, I will send it. Thanks Jon! Cheers, Miguel
