On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 06:51:59PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote: > Hi folks, > > This v3 is mostly about the naming problem - get your paintbrushes ready! > > Patches > ======= > > o Patch 1 is the meat of the topic - note that it's now in tip/sched/urgent > o Patch 2 introduces helpers for the dynamic preempt state > o Patches 3-4 make use of said accessors where relevant. > > Testing > ======= > > Briefly tested the dynamic part on an x86 kernel + QEMU. > Compile-tested the kcsan test thingie as a module. > > Revisions > ========= > > v1: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20211105104035.3112162-1-valentin.schneider@xxxxxxx > v1.5: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20211109151057.3489223-1-valentin.schneider@xxxxxxx > > v2 -> v3 > ++++++++ > > o Turned is_preempt_*() into preempt_model_*() (Frederic) > It breaks my rule of "booleans must answer a yes/no question" but is the best > I could come with using a "preempt_" prefix > > o Added preempt_model_preemptible() (Marco) > Now used in kcsan_test.c > > o Dropped powerpc changes > > Cheers, > Valentin > > > Valentin Schneider (4): > preempt: Restore preemption model selection configs Seems like this one has been applied from the previous series. > preempt/dynamic: Introduce preemption model accessors > kcsan: Use preemption model accessors > ftrace: Use preemption model accessors for trace header printout So for the rest: Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks!
