On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 11:54 PM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 2:14 PM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 10:47 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > > > > > As we change the C language standard for the kernel from gnu89 to > > > gnu11, it makes sense to also update the version for user space > > > compilation. > > > > > > > Overdue. > > > > Can you point me to a lore link where I can easily fetch the full 3/3 > > v3 patchset? > > Hey Sedat! > > $ b4 am https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220301145233.3689119-1-arnd@xxxxxxxxxx/ > -o - | git am -3 > Hey Nick! This only applies 1/3. $ b4 --version 0.8.0 $ b4 am https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220301145233.3689119-1-arnd@xxxxxxxxxx/ -o - | git am -3 Analyzing 14 messages in the thread Will use the latest revision: v3 You can pick other revisions using the -vN flag Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment... --- ✓ [PATCH v3 1/3] Kbuild: move to -std=gnu11 ✓ Signed: DKIM/kernel.org + Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> (✓ DKIM/kernel.org) ERROR: missing [2/3]! ERROR: missing [3/3]! --- NOTE: install patatt for end-to-end signature verification --- Total patches: 1 --- WARNING: Thread incomplete! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220301145233.3689119-1-arnd@xxxxxxxxxx Base: not specified Wende an: Kbuild: move to -std=gnu11 - Sedat - > https://people.kernel.org/monsieuricon/introducing-b4-and-patch-attestation > > > > > I would like to give this a try on x86-64 with my latest kernel-config > > (based on the latest kernel-config v5.17-rc5 from Debian/unstable). > > > > What Linux source base do I need? > > Is Linux v5.17-rc6 good enough (patchset applicable) for testing? > > I suspect so. > -- > Thanks, > ~Nick Desaulniers
