On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 1:15 PM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 11:18:07AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > I'd be much more amenable to that approach. > > Sounds good, tentative patch attached, it passes all of my testing. > There is an instance of $(LLVM) in tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk that I > did not touch, as that will presumably have to go through the selftests > tree. I can send a separate patch for that later. LGTM! Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers
