On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 12:34:34PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > Re "won't do" -- sorry for trying to hijack this thread a bit, but > did I miss something? The last comments I've read were that LLVM > tools need to change their approach for CFI on x86, and Sami went > redo it, but I can't recall any "life-time" nacks. Won't as in the lclang-cfi as it exists today. And I've understood that this CFI model is a keeper. It is true that Sami has been working on an alternative KCFI, but the little I can make of this proposal, it still needs serious work. Also see here: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220211133803.GV23216@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Specifically, I object to the existence of any __*cfi_check_fail symbol on the grounds that it will bloat the code (and makes thinking about the whole speculation angle more painful than it needs to be).
