On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 7:30 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 12:39:57AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > +CC the maintainers of CERTIFICATE HANDLING > > M: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> > > M: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > L: keyrings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Davids, can one of you respond to this? > > > On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 12:11 PM Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) > > <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > If the config file specifies a signing key, use it to sign > > > the kernel so that machines with SecureBoot enabled can boot. > > > See https://wiki.debian.org/SecureBoot > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > v2: > > > - Handle private keys stored in the pem file as well as adjacent to the > > > certificate > > > - Handle certificate paths specified relative to both dsttree and srctree > > > (as well as absolute) > > > - Only try to sign the executable if EFI_STUB is enabled > > > - Only try to execute sbsign if it's in $PATH > > > > > > scripts/package/builddeb | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/scripts/package/builddeb b/scripts/package/builddeb > > > index 91a502bb97e8..9dd92fd02b12 100755 > > > --- a/scripts/package/builddeb > > > +++ b/scripts/package/builddeb > > > @@ -147,7 +147,30 @@ else > > > cp System.map "$tmpdir/boot/System.map-$version" > > > cp $KCONFIG_CONFIG "$tmpdir/boot/config-$version" > > > fi > > > -cp "$($MAKE -s -f $srctree/Makefile image_name)" "$tmpdir/$installed_image_path" > > > + > > > +vmlinux=$($MAKE -s -f $srctree/Makefile image_name) > > > +key= > > > +if is_enabled CONFIG_EFI_STUB && is_enabled CONFIG_MODULE_SIG; then > > > + cert=$(grep ^CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY= include/config/auto.conf | cut -d\" -f2) > > > + if [ ! -f $cert ]; then > > > + cert=$srctree/$cert > > > + fi > > > + > > > + key=${cert%pem}priv > > > + if [ ! -f $key ]; then > > > + key=$cert > > > + fi > > > > > > I still do not understand this part. > > > > It is true that the Debian document you referred to creates separate files > > for the key and the certificate: > > # openssl req -new -x509 -newkey rsa:2048 -keyout MOK.priv -outform > > DER -out MOK.der -days 36500 -subj "/CN=My Name/" -nodes > > > > but, is such a use-case possible in Kbuild? > > I don't think it matters whether *Kbuild* can generate one file or > two. If somebody follows the *Debian* document, they will have > two files. It would surely be desirable that if somebody has followed > the Debian instructions that we would then sign the kernel using the > keys they previously generated. If I am not wrong, extracting the key path from CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY is not Debian's way. I checked the kernel configuration on bullseye, CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY is empty, while the module signing itself is enabled. masahiro@debian:~$ cat /etc/os-release PRETTY_NAME="Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" NAME="Debian GNU/Linux" VERSION_ID="11" VERSION="11 (bullseye)" VERSION_CODENAME=bullseye ID=debian HOME_URL="https://www.debian.org/" SUPPORT_URL="https://www.debian.org/support" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.debian.org/" masahiro@debian:~$ grep CONFIG_MODULE_SIG /boot/config-$(uname -r) CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORMAT=y CONFIG_MODULE_SIG=y # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is not set # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_ALL is not set # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_SHA1 is not set # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_SHA224 is not set CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_SHA256=y # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_SHA384 is not set # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_SHA512 is not set CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_HASH="sha256" CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY="" Presumably, the reason is that distributions cannot be shipped with the private key. > > In the old days, yes, the key and the certificate were stored in separate files. > > (the key in *.priv and the certificate in *.x509) > > > > > > Please read this commit: > > > > > > commit fb1179499134bc718dc7557c7a6a95dc72f224cb > > Author: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Mon Jul 20 21:16:30 2015 +0100 > > > > modsign: Use single PEM file for autogenerated key > > > > The current rule for generating signing_key.priv and signing_key.x509 is > > a classic example of a bad rule which has a tendency to break parallel > > make. When invoked to create *either* target, it generates the other > > target as a side-effect that make didn't predict. > > > > So let's switch to using a single file signing_key.pem which contains > > both key and certificate. That matches what we do in the case of an > > external key specified by CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY anyway, so it's also > > slightly cleaner. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > Since then, both key and certificate are stored in a single *.pem file. > > I did read that commit. I think it's a terrible idea. If the > secret key & the certificate are stored in the same file, it's > no better than a symmetric cipher. Not even SSH does this! I am with you on this point, but separating the cert and priv is another story. > > > The motivation for this change is still questionable to me; > > the commit description sounds like they merged *.priv and *.x509 > > into *.pem just because they could not write a correct Makefile. > > (If requested, I can write a correct Makefile that works in parallel build) > > > > But, anyway, as long as I read the current code, we never > > have a separate *.priv file. > > > > > > The help message of the config option supports my view. > > > > > > config MODULE_SIG_KEY > > string "File name or PKCS#11 URI of module signing key" > > default "certs/signing_key.pem" > > depends on MODULE_SIG || (IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG && MODULES) > > help > > Provide the file name of a private key/certificate in PEM format, > > or a PKCS#11 URI according to RFC7512. The file should contain, or > > the URI should identify, both the certificate and its corresponding > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > private key. > > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > > > > > I CC'ed David Howells, David Woodhouse, keyrings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > in case I understood wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + if ! command -v sbsign >/dev/null; then > > > + key= > > > + fi > > > +fi > > > + > > > +if [ -n "$key" ]; then > > > + sbsign --key $key --cert $cert "$vmlinux" --output "$tmpdir/$installed_image_path" > > > +else > > > + cp "$vmlinux" "$tmpdir/$installed_image_path" > > > +fi > > > > > > if is_enabled CONFIG_OF_EARLY_FLATTREE; then > > > # Only some architectures with OF support have this target > > > -- > > > 2.33.0 > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards > > Masahiro Yamada -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada