Hi Luis,
My replies in-line under Vimal>>
Thanks,
Vimal
-----Original Message-----
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, 9 December 2021 at 1:03 AM
To: Vimal Agrawal <Vimal.Agrawal@xxxxxxxxxx>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Marek <michal.lkml@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kbuild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kbuild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx" <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/module.c: fix for symbol decode in stack trace for stripped modules
Thanks for your patch! I will note to start off with that unfortunately
whatever it is you use to send emails leaves them with UTF encodings
which does not let me easily download the patches using lore. For
instance, this is what I see:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/106F23FD-3768-4CF0-893D-EDFE4A0BA2BF@xxxxxxxxxx/raw
Here is an example of a good patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211129034509.2646872-2-ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx/raw
What are you using to send patches? Consider using git send-email.
I think your mailer is sending the emails out as MIME attachments.
Vimal>> I am using outlook app on mac and I changed format to use "plain format text". I will use git send-email from next time for patches.
Thanks for letting me know.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 02:02:30PM +0000, Vimal Agrawal wrote:
> If kernel modules are stripped off symbols (say built by using strip --
> strip-unneeded)
OK so is your build system using something like:
make install modules_install INSTALL_MOD_STRIP="--strip-unneeded"
At least that's one way to strip modules using upstream techniques since
the 2.6 kernel days. Because it would be wise for us to document *how* to
reproduce the issue you are seeing in your commit log.
Vimal>> yes, our build uses INSTALL_MOD_STRIP="--strip-unneeded"
> then stack traces in dmesg do not show module name or
> symbol name for addresses.
as intended. So there is actually no issue and your patch is not a fix.
It is an optimization to help readers with a hint. So if we get anywhere
with this patch I'd say change the subject to relate it to
a heuristic enhancement for INSTALL_MOD_STRIP when --strip-unneeded is used.
Vimal>> yes, problem is only when --strip-unneeded option is used to strip the modules.
> It just prints absolute address ( without any
> reference of module)
> e.g.
>
> [245864.699580] do_nmi+0x12f/0x370
> [245864.699583] end_repeat_nmi+0x16/0x50
> [245864.699585] RIP: 0010:0xffffffffc06b67ec <<<<<<<<
> [245864.699585] RSP: 0000:ffffaaa540cffe48 EFLAGS: 00000097
> [245864.699586] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff93357a729000 RCX: 0000000000000001
> [245864.699587] RDX: ffff93357a729050 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff93357a729000
> [245864.699588] RBP: ffff9335cf521300 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000004
> [245864.699588] R10: ffffaaa545b23ed0 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffffc06b61a0
> [245864.699589] R13: ffffaaa540cffe60 R14: ffff9335c77fa3c0 R15: ffff9335cf51d7c0
> [245864.699590] ? 0xffffffffc06b61a0
> [245864.699592] ? 0xffffffffc06b67ec <<<<<<<<
> [245864.699593] ? 0xffffffffc06b67ec
> [245864.699594] </NMI>
>
> Note RIP: 0010:0xffffffffc06b67ec and 0xffffffffc06b67ec printed in above
> stack trace as absolute address.
> There is no easy way in case box crashes as we loose /proc/modules to see
> load address of modules to map address to one specific module. It will be
> really good to give some hint of module and offset inside module section
> about such addresses.
>
> so changed kernel/module.c so that it can decode address to _MODULE_START_+
> offset/size or _MODULE_INIT_+offset/size depending on where the address
> lies (in core/.text or init/.init.text section of module).
>
> e.g. nfnm_queue_net_init+0x2f1/0x393 [nfnetmap_queue] printed in case of
> symbols present shows up as 0010:0xffffffffc06b67ec in case symbols are
> absent. With modified logic, it will be shown as _MODULE_INIT_+0x2f1/0x393
> [nfnetmap_queue]
>
> This will help for developer to debug and map this to actual nfnm_queue_net
> _init symbol later. One can use objdump/readelf/nm to find symbols with
> offset in .init.text and .text sections.
>
> tests done:
> ===========
> 1. added WARN_ON_ONE(1) in init_module of a module
> ----------------------------------------------------
> [53.795977] task: ffff9d60094b3000 task.stack: ffff9d602c704000
> [53.795978] RIP: 0010:_MODULE_INIT_+0x2f1/0x393 [nfnetmap_queue] <=====
Huh, if the module is already printed (the [nfnetmap_queue]) why even
have _MODULE_INIT_ and instead we just say:
[53.795978] RIP: 0010:[module __init]+0x2f1/0x393 [nfnetmap_queue]
This way if you come up with other heuristics this can also be put in
the [] and we'd document that.
Vimal>> I am fine with that. I used _MODULE_INIT_ and _MODULE_START_ because I see something similar being reported by bt command in crash utility in these cases. So I took reference of that. See following bt from crash utility:
<<
#6 [ffff99cdc059b8c0] _MODULE_START_act_mirred at ffffffffc06cd7ee [act_mirred]
#7 [ffff99cdc059b900] tcf_action_exec at ffffffff864c57bc
#8 [ffff99cdc059b948] _MODULE_START_cls_u32 at ffffffffc06d2620 [cls_u32]
>>
It is following format of _MODULE_START_<module_name>. As I saw module name already at the end under [] so I removed the module name.
> [53.795979] RSP: 0018:ffff9d602c707c40 EFLAGS: 00010286
> [53.795980] RAX: 0000000000000047 RBX: ffff9d600b4c0800 RCX: 0000000000000006
> [53.795980] RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: 0000000000000096 RDI: ffff9d603fc172f0
> [53.795981] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00000000000004bd R09: 0000000000000002
> [53.795981] R10: ffffffffc2250083 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9d5fb785a870
> [53.795982] R13: 00000000fffffff4 R14: ffff9d5fb785a800 R15: 0000000000000000
> [53.795983] FS: 00007ffb73c2ab80(0000) GS:ffff9d603fc00000(0000)
> [53.795983] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [53.795984] CR2: 00000000f76e6270 CR3: 0000000107c0c006 CR4: 00000000001606f0
> [53.796014] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> [53.796014] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> [53.796015] Call Trace:
> [53.796022] ops_init.constprop.8+0x81/0x110
> [53.796024] register_pernet_operations+0x92/0xc0
> [53.796026] ? _MODULE_INIT_+0x393/0x393 [nfnetmap_queue] <======
> [53.796027] register_pernet_subsys+0x1f/0x40
> [53.796028] init_module+0x51/0xc6d [nfnetmap_queue]
> [53.796031] do_one_initcall+0x36/0x160
>
> 2. added a call to sprint_symbol in a module
> ---------------------------------------------
> $ decode for symbol nfnm_queue_flush+16:
> _MODULE_START_+0x7e0/0x1daa [nfnetmap_queue] <======
>
> $ nm nfnetmap_queue.ko | grep _flush
> 00000000000007d0 t nfnm_queue_flush
> 0x7d0 + 16d = 0x7e0 so this offset maps to symbol nfnm_queue_flush
>
> tested on kernel 4.14.38
>
> Signed-off-by: Vimal Agrawal <vimal.agrawal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/module.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
> index 84a9141a5e15..d55fb8405151 100644
> --- a/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/kernel/module.c
> @@ -4259,12 +4259,19 @@ static const char *find_kallsyms_symbol(struct module *mod,
> unsigned int i, best = 0;
> unsigned long nextval, bestval;
> struct mod_kallsyms *kallsyms = rcu_dereference_sched(mod->kallsyms);
> + char *module_base_name = "_MODULE_START_";
I don't think "_MODULE_START_" tells the user anything clear.
If we're going to use heuristics best we use a nomenclature we
can expand later and not be cryptic.
So maybe just [module] is good enough.
Vimal>> As mentioned above, I just took reference from bt output of crash utility. Problem is some symbol will be from init section in module. So user needs to know if it belongs to core or init section of module so that it can be decoded manually later. We need some hint for user to suggest if it is part of init section or not.
Are you suggesting [module] for address in core section and [module __init] (with space between module and _init) for init section?
We don't have to initialize this as well, as its either one or the other.
Vimal>> yes. I will fix it.
> + unsigned long module_base_address = 0;
>
> /* At worse, next value is at end of module */
> - if (within_module_init(addr, mod))
> + if (within_module_init(addr, mod)) {
> nextval = (unsigned long)mod->init_layout.base+mod->init_layout.text_size;
> - else
> + module_base_address = (unsigned long)mod->init_layout.base;
> + module_base_name = "_MODULE_INIT_";
> + } else {
> nextval = (unsigned long)mod->core_layout.base+mod->core_layout.text_size;
> + module_base_address = (unsigned long)mod->core_layout.base;
> + module_base_name = "_MODULE_START_";
> + }
>
> bestval = kallsyms_symbol_value(&kallsyms->symtab[best]);
>
> @@ -4295,8 +4302,14 @@ static const char *find_kallsyms_symbol(struct module *mod,
> nextval = thisval;
> }
>
> - if (!best)
> - return NULL;
> + if (!best) {
> + /* return MODULE base and offset from it */
> + if (size)
> + *size = nextval - module_base_address;
> + if (offset)
> + *offset = addr - module_base_address;
> + return module_base_name;
Have you tested this on recent kernels? If not please test this there
as I cannot reproduce with your changes taking effect at all. In fact
this branch is not hit at all.
Vimal>> No. I tested on kernel 4.14.173 only. I will test on latest kernel. Have you stripped the module using --strip-unneeded? I saw the code base for this function is same in latest vs 4.14.173 so I skipped the testing part on latest kernel. Will do that now.
Luis
