On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 6:07 AM Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Most of the documentation for Rust is written within the source code > itself, as it is idiomatic for Rust projects. This applies to both > the shared infrastructure at `rust/` as well as any other Rust module > (e.g. drivers) written across the kernel. I'm sure Documentation/rust/ will grow over time; there's certainly more that can be added and core kernel devs will have more questions over time. I'm still running into a SNAFU actually building; see https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKwvOdk9VNenJJN5HnPpGgsHT+OsRsgPGSesQgqMP2aLPWy0NQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/. But I read through all that was added here and didn't find anything problematic IMO. I didn't verify the png's are actually the logo... I don't think `make htmldocs` produced any new warnings, though it's not exactly warning free at the moment (pre-existing before this series). > However, these documents contain general information that does not > fit particularly well in the source code, like the Quick Start guide. > > It also contains a few binary assets used for the `rustdoc` target > and a few other small changes elsewhere in the documentation folder. How is rust-logo.png being included in the docs? Is there something with RST that isn't grep'able for rust-logo.png? > -- > 2.34.0 > -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers