On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:29:39PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 12:31PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 09:10:27AM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> [...]
> > > + if (insn->sec->noinstr && sym->removable_instr) {
> [...]
> > I'd love to have a clearer name than 'removable_instr', though I'm
> > having trouble coming up with something.
> [...]
>
> I now have the below as v3 of this patch. The naming isn't entirely
> obvious, but coming up with a short name for this is tricky, but
> hopefully the comments make it clear. We can of course still pick
> another name.
>
> Does that look reasonable?
>
> Note, I'd like this series to sit in -next for a while (probably from
> some time next week after sending v3 if there are no further
> complaints). By default everything will be picked up by the -rcu tree,
> and we're targeting Linux 5.18.
>
> If you feel there might be objtool conflicts coming, this patch could be
> taken through another tree as there are no hard dependencies, as long as
> this patch reaches mainline before or with the rest.
>
> Thanks,
> -- Marco
Looks good to me. I don't know of any upcoming conflicts, feel free to
carry it with your series for now.
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Josh
