On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 07:42:49PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 19:26:05 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>
> > From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This is a riscv port of commit d6e2cc564775("arm64: extable: add `type`
> > and `data` fields").
> >
> > We will add specialized handlers for fixups, the `type` field is for
> > fixup handler type, the `data` field is used to pass specific data to
> > each handler, for example register numbers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > diff --git a/scripts/sorttable.c b/scripts/sorttable.c
> > index 0c031e47a419..5b5472b543f5 100644
> > --- a/scripts/sorttable.c
> > +++ b/scripts/sorttable.c
> > @@ -376,9 +376,11 @@ static int do_file(char const *const fname, void *addr)
> > case EM_PARISC:
> > case EM_PPC:
> > case EM_PPC64:
> > - case EM_RISCV:
> > custom_sort = sort_relative_table;
> > break;
> > + case EM_RISCV:
> > + custom_sort = arm64_sort_relative_table;
>
> Hi Mark, Thomas,
>
> x86 and arm64 version of sort_relative_table routine are the same, I want to
> unify them, and then use the common function for riscv, but I'm not sure
> which name is better. Could you please suggest?
I sent a patch last week which unifies them as
sort_relative_table_with_data():
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20211108114220.32796-1-mark.rutland@xxxxxxx/
Thomas, are you happy with that patch?
With your ack it could go via the riscv tree for v5.17 as a preparatory
cleanup in this series.
Maybe we could get it in as a cleanup for v5.16-rc{2,3} ?
Thanks,
Mark.
