On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:40 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Anyway, this is a long way to say that I don't think I want to add > a new gcc-plugin when it is at "State 2" (i.e. Clang has support but > GCC doesn't.) There's no need to "prove" that the compiler feature is > generally desirable, so it's best to get this into GCC directly. Sounds reasonable. Cc'ing linux-toolchains, by the way. Cheers, Miguel
