On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 11:29 AM Dan Li <ashimida@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 10/15/21 2:44 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > Overall, I'm happy with the patch and am ready to ack it, but I would > > like to see a link to to the upstream GCC feature request for SCS (and > > one created if it doesn't exist) cited explicitly in the commit > > message. I think that would be a good demonstration that this can or > > will be upstreamed into the compiler proper for the compiler vendors > > to maintain, rather than the kernel folks. The compiler vendors may > > have further feedback on the approach, such as my question above > > pertaining to inlining. > > > I have submitted a feature request to the gcc community, and waiting > for a follow-up response. > > Is it fine to add the following description in [PATCH V5]? > > A similar feature request has also been sent to gcc. > link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102768 Yes, and you can include Acked-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> too. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers
