On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 2:19 AM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > maximally flexible." We don't want folks generally using CC=clang; > preferably they'd use LLVM=1. I need to rewrite our docs to make that > more explicit and straightforward. And if folks would prefer to use > CC=clang for whatever reason, let them explicitly state CROSS_COMPILE > then. Perhaps it would be nice to clarify the "level of support" for `CC=clang` too, in particular long-term when `LLVM=1` works for all architectures. In other words, is `CC=clang` going to remain supported/maintained, or it will be something that will still compile/boot but not expected to be used by anyone in production, or dropped altogether (not the `CC` option itself, of course, I refer to the mix of toolchains)? Thanks, Cheers, Miguel
