Re: [PATCH 47/64] btrfs: Use memset_after() to clear end of struct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 01:58:38PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time
> field bounds checking for memset(), avoid intentionally writing across
> neighboring fields.
> 
> Use memset_after() so memset() doesn't get confused about writing
> beyond the destination member that is intended to be the starting point
> of zeroing through the end of the struct.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/root-tree.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c
> index 702dc5441f03..ec9e78f65fca 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c
> @@ -39,10 +39,7 @@ static void btrfs_read_root_item(struct extent_buffer *eb, int slot,
>  		need_reset = 1;
>  	}
>  	if (need_reset) {
> -		memset(&item->generation_v2, 0,
> -			sizeof(*item) - offsetof(struct btrfs_root_item,
> -					generation_v2));
> -

Please add
		/* Clear all members from generation_v2 onwards */

> +		memset_after(item, 0, level);
>  		generate_random_guid(item->uuid);

Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux