On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 4:32 AM Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 1:26 PM Miguel Ojeda > <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I am not sure if it is best or not to have the GCC link in order to be > > consistent with the rest of the links (they are for the docs only). Do > > we know if GCC going to implement it soon? > > i.e. if GCC does not implement it yet we use elsewhere this kind of > marker instead: > > * Optional: not supported by gcc > > The first of its kind, normally it is clang/icc there ;-) :^) GCC does have an attribute since GCC 7.1 for this. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223#c11 I'm moving Clang over to use that in https://reviews.llvm.org/D104658 Once that lands, I'll send a v2 (without carrying any reviewed by tags). > > We could nevertheless have the link there, something like: > > * Optional: not supported by GCC > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223 -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers
