On 12-03-21, 01:09, Frank Rowand wrote: > I suggested having the .dtso files include the .dts file because that is a relatively > small and easy change to test. What would probably make more sense is the rename > the existing overlay .dts files to be .dtso files and then for each overlay .dtso > file create a new .dts file that #includes the corresponding .dtso file. This is > more work and churn, but easier to document that the .dts files are a hack that is > needed so that the corresponding .dtb.S files will be generated. What about creating links instead then ? -- viresh
