> On Feb 3, 2021, at 11:49 AM, Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This looks good to me, and it still works for my use case. Eric's > patchset only looks for asymmetric keys in the blacklist keyring, so > even if we use the same keyring we don't look for the same key types. My > patchset only allows blacklist keys (i.e. hashes, not asymmetric keys) > to be added by user space (if authenticated), but because Eric's > asymmetric keys are loaded with KEY_ALLOC_BYPASS_RESTRICTION, it should > be OK for his use case. There should be no interference between the two > new features, but I find it a bit confusing to have such distinct use of > keys from the same keyring depending on their type. I agree, it is a bit confusing. What is the thought of having a dbx keyring, similar to how the platform keyring works? https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-security-module/msg40262.html > On 03/02/2021 17:26, David Howells wrote: >> >> Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> This is the fifth patch series for adding support for >>> EFI_CERT_X509_GUID entries [1]. It has been expanded to not only include >>> dbx entries but also entries in the mokx. Additionally my series to >>> preload these certificate [2] has also been included. >> >> Okay, I've tentatively applied this to my keys-next branch. However, it >> conflicts minorly with Mickaël Salaün's patches that I've previously merged on >> the same branch. Can you have a look at the merge commit >> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/commit/?h=keys-next&id=fdbbe7ceeb95090d09c33ce0497e0394c82aa33d >> >> (the top patch of my keys-next branch) >> >> to see if that is okay by both of you? If so, can you give it a whirl? I’m seeing a build error within blacklist_hashes_checked with one of my configs. The config is as follows: $ grep CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST .config CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST=“revocation_list" $ cat certs/revocation_list "tbs:1e125ea4f38acb7b29b0c495fd8e7602c2c3353b913811a9da3a2fb505c08a32” make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'revocation_list', needed by 'certs/blacklist_hashes_checked'. Stop.