+++ William Mcvicker [23/11/20 14:13 -0800]:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 09:02:57AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 01:16:49AM +0000, Will McVicker wrote:
> These two patches add module support to capture an external module's SCM
> version as a MODULE_INFO() attribute. This allows users to identity the SCM
> version of a given kernel module by using the modinfo tool or on the device
> via sysfs:
As this obviously is of no use for in-tree modules it falls under the we
don't add code to support things that are not in tree rule and has no
business in the kernel.
Hi Christoph,
Ah sorry, I didn't intend this to come across as only for external modules.
That just seemed like the easiest way to explain how the scmversion attribute
can be different from the vermagic. We mainly need this for in-tree kernel
modules since that's where most our drivers are. Let me re-phrase this with
that in mind. Basically, I like to look at this as an improved version of the
existing srcversion module attribute since it allows you to easily identify the
module version with a quick SCM version string check instead of doing a full
checksum on the module source.
For example, we have a setup to test kernel changes on the hikey and db845c
devices without updating the kernel modules. Without this scmversion module
attribute, you can't identify the original module version using `uname
-r`. And for kernel modules in the initramfs, you can't even use modinfo to get
the module vermagic. With this patch, you are able to get the SCM version for
*all* kernel modules (on disk and in the initramfs) via the sysfs node:
/sys/module/<mod>/scmversion. This also works the other way around when
developers update their kernel modules to fix some bug (like a security
vulnerability) but don't need to update the full kernel.
Hi Will,
If this were also intended for in-tree kernel modules, then why do
intree modules only get the UTS_RELEASE string in their scmversion
field, which basically already exists in the vermagic? Or do you plan
to change that?
Jessica
