On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:24:58AM +0000, George Popescu wrote: > This would mean losing the local-bounds coverage. I tried to test it without > local-bounds and with a locally defined array on the stack and it works fine > (the handler is called and the error reported). For me it feels like > --array-bounds and --local-bounds are triggered for the same type of > undefined_behaviours but they are handling them different. Er, if --array-bounds still works on local arrays, what does local-bounds actually do? >_> :P If we don't have a reduction in coverage, yeah, I'm fine to turn that off. -- Kees Cook
