On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 06:26:44PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Originally, bpfilter_umh was linked with -static only when
> CONFIG_BPFILTER_UMH=y.
>
> Commit 8a2cc0505cc4 ("bpfilter: use 'userprogs' syntax to build
> bpfilter_umh") silently, accidentally dropped the CONFIG_BPFILTER_UMH=y
> test in the Makefile. Revive it in order to link it dynamically when
> CONFIG_BPFILTER_UMH=m.
>
> Since commit b1183b6dca3e ("bpfilter: check if $(CC) can link static
> libc in Kconfig"), the compiler must be capable of static linking to
> enable CONFIG_BPFILTER_UMH, but it requires more than needed.
>
> To loosen the compiler requirement, I changed the dependency as follows:
>
> depends on CC_CAN_LINK
> depends on m || CC_CAN_LINK_STATIC
>
> If CONFIG_CC_CAN_LINK_STATIC in unset, CONFIG_BPFILTER_UMH is restricted
> to 'm' or 'n'.
>
> In theory, CONFIG_CC_CAN_LINK is not required for CONFIG_BPFILTER_UMH=y,
> but I did not come up with a good way to describe it.
>
> Fixes: 8a2cc0505cc4 ("bpfilter: use 'userprogs' syntax to build bpfilter_umh")
> Reported-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
lgtm
Do you mind I'll take it into bpf-next tree?
Eric is working on a bunch of patches in this area. I'll take his set
into bpf-next as well and then can apply this patch.
Just to make sure there are no conflicts.
