On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 4:21 PM Alexander Popov <alex.popov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04.06.2020 17:14, Jann Horn wrote: > > Maybe at some point we should replace exclusions based on > > GCC_PLUGINS_CFLAGS and KASAN_SANITIZE and UBSAN_SANITIZE and > > OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD and so on with something more generic... > > something that says "this file will not be built into the normal > > kernel, it contains code that runs in realmode / userspace / some > > similarly weird context, and none of our instrumentation > > infrastructure is available there"... > > Good idea. I would also add 'notrace' to that list. Hm? notrace code should definitely still be subject to sanitizer instrumentation.
