On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 09:04:26PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 03:41:52PM -0500, Arvind Sankar wrote: > > Commit bcdedcc1afd6 ("menuconfig: print more info for symbol without > > prompts") moved some code from get_prompt_str to get_symbol_str so that > > dependency information for symbols without prompts could be shown. > > > > This code would be better copied rather than moved, as the change had > > the side-effect of not showing any extra dependencies that the prompt > > might have over the symbol. > > > > Put back a copy of the dependency printing code in get_prompt_str. > > Umm... Is "visible" really accurate in this case? AFAICS, the > entry (and help for it) _is_ visible with EXPERT=n. OTOH, with > EXPERT=y and MULTIUSER=n it disappears completely. > > I'm not familiar with kconfig guts (and not too concerned about that > feature of help there, TBH), but it looks like what you are printing > there is some mix of dependencies ("visible when") and selectability... Perhaps not the most accurate term. For NAMESPACES it has a submenu, so it can't disappear as long as its selected, even if it's not editable any more. A "leaf" level option like MULTIUSER, otoh, does disappear completely (even though it's still selected). But there are also things like CONFIG_VT, which stays visible, even though its not a menu.. I think because there is a visible option that depends on it and immediately follows, which menuconfig shows by indenting. If the order of UNIX98_PTYS and VT_HW_CONSOLE_BINDING is flipped in drivers/tty/Kconfig, then VT disappears when EXPERT=n. Dunno, maybe Editable would be a better word than Visible?