On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:55:18 -0800 Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ping. Couple of notes: 1) this affects code that doesn't really have a maintainer. I could take it in my tree, but I would like to have acks from other maintainers. Perhaps Jessica Yu (Module maintainer), and probably one from Linus himself. 2) Do not send new versions of a patch as a reply to the old version. I and many other maintainers sort our inbox by threads, and I look at the top of the thread for patches. That is, if there's another version of a patch that is a reply to a previous version, it is basically off my radar, unless I happen to notice it by chance (which I did with this email). You can send your v4 patch again, but please send it as its own thread, that way it will be on the radar of other maintainers. Hopefully we can get some acks on this as well. -- Steve > > > On 12/10/2019 09:48 AM, eugene.loh@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > /proc/kallsyms is very useful for tracers and other tools that need > > to map kernel symbols to addresses. > > > > It would be useful if there were a mapping between kernel symbol and > > module name that only changed when the kernel source code is changed. > > This mapping should not vanish simply because a module becomes built > > into the kernel. > >
