On 21/10/2019 16:53, Jean Delvare wrote: > This would also be in line with how it was implemented in dmidecode. Is > there any reason to NOT go that route? The main reason was I though it would be easier to compare releases by splitting major & minor. That is probably overkill, so I'll stick to the usual way to represent a release in V2. Thanks for the review, Erwan,
