On 11/11/19 2:56 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 14:49:51 +0100
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/10/19 5:31 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
Side effect of some kbuild changes resulted in breaking the
documented way to build samples/bpf/.
This patch change the samples/bpf/Makefile to work again, when
invoking make from the subdir samples/bpf/. Also update the
documentation in README.rst, to reflect the new way to build.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Please make sure to have bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc'ed in future as well
(done here). Given net-next in subject, any specific reason you need
this expedited over normal bpf-next route? Looks like there is no
conflict either way.
When I created this patch, bpf-next didn't have the other fixes for
samples/bpf/. If you have sync'ed with net-next, then I'm fine with
Correct, as they were just merged by Linus over the weekend. For bpf-next,
we fast-fwd after every PR that is sent for net-next. For fixes the route
is bpf -> net -> linus -> net-next -> bpf-next.
you taking this change (as it will propagate back to DaveM's tree soon
enough).
Ok, I don't think the M= adjustment to get it back in line with the samples
README is urgent, but lets go with net-next directly then and have it
propagate back later this week, sent my Acked-by previously for carrying on.
Thanks,
Daniel
