On 10/29/19 7:43 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: > On 17:05 Tue 29 Oct 2019, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> Hi, > Thank you Randy, my answers are inline , kindly look. > > The modified version(implemented your suggestions) of the script and their interaction will send in next patch mail. >> >> >> This patch does not delete the original script loop, so that still follows >> after the 'done' above. Was that intentional? > This is confuse me! not sure what you meant. Did you meant to say > the do loop inside does not match with this pair??? I mean that the old loop that begins with for f in "$@" is still there after your patch. -- ~Randy
