Hi Nick, Nathan, On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 6:56 AM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 2:34 PM Nathan Chancellor > <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 01:58:05PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:28 PM Nathan Chancellor > > > <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 07:36:21PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > > > GCC and Clang have different policy for -Wunused-function; GCC never > > > > > reports unused-function warnings for 'static inline' functions whereas > > > > > Clang reports them if they are defined in source files instead of > > > > > included headers although it has been suppressed since commit > > > > > abb2ea7dfd82 ("compiler, clang: suppress warning for unused static > > > > > inline functions"). > > > > > > > > > > We often miss to remove unused functions where 'static inline' is used > > > > > in .c files since there is no tool to detect them. Unused code remains > > > > > until somebody notices. For example, commit 075ddd75680f ("regulator: > > > > > core: remove unused rdev_get_supply()"). > > > > > > > > > > Let's remove __maybe_unused from the inline macro to allow Clang to > > > > > start finding unused static inline functions. As always, it is not a > > > > > good idea to sprinkle warnings for the normal build, so I added > > > > > -Wno-unsued-function for no W= build. > > > > > > s/unsued/unused/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > Per the documentation [1], -Wno-unused-function will also disable > > > > > -Wunneeded-internal-declaration, which can help find bugs like > > > > > commit 8289c4b6f2e5 ("platform/x86: mlx-platform: Properly use > > > > > mlxplat_mlxcpld_msn201x_items"). (pointed out by Nathan Chancellor) > > > > > I added -Wunneeded-internal-declaration to address it. > > > > > > > > > > If you contribute to code clean-up, please run "make CC=clang W=1" > > > > > and check -Wunused-function warnings. You will find lots of unused > > > > > functions. > > > > > > > > > > Some of them are false-positives because the call-sites are disabled > > > > > by #ifdef. I do not like to abuse the inline keyword for suppressing > > > > > unused-function warnings because it is intended to be a hint for the > > > > > compiler's optimization. I prefer __maybe_unused or #ifdef around the > > > > > definition. > > > > > > I'd say __maybe_unused for function parameters that are used depending > > > of ifdefs in the body of the function, otherwise strictly ifdefs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html#wunused-function > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > I am still not a big fan of this as I think it weakens clang as a > > > > standalone compiler but the change itself looks good so if it is going > > > > in anyways: > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > I'm sure Nick would like to weigh in as well before this gets merged. > > > > > > So right away for an x86_64 defconfig w/ this patch, clang points out: > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c:84:20: warning: unused function > > > 'debug_fence_init_onstack' [-Wunused-function] > > > static inline void debug_fence_init_onstack(struct i915_sw_fence *fence) > > > ^ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c:105:20: warning: unused function > > > 'debug_fence_free' [-Wunused-function] > > > static inline void debug_fence_free(struct i915_sw_fence *fence) > > > ^ > > > > > > The first looks fishy (grep -r debug_fence_init_onstack), the second > > > only has a callsite ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_SW_FENCE_DEBUG_OBJECTS. > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c:1117:20: warning: unused > > > function 'ctx_save_restore_disabled' [-Wunused-function] > > > static inline bool ctx_save_restore_disabled(struct intel_context *ce) > > > ^ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c:1696:26: warning: unused > > > function 'intel_hdmi_hdcp2_protocol' [-Wunused-function] > > > enum hdcp_wired_protocol intel_hdmi_hdcp2_protocol(void) > > > ^ > > > arm64 defconfig builds cleanly, same with arm. Things might get more > > > hairy with all{yes|mod}config, but the existing things it finds don't > > > look insurmountable to me. In fact, I'll file bugs in our issue > > > tracker (https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues) for the > > > above. > > > > > > So I'm not certain this patch weakens existing checks. > > > > Well, we no longer get -Wunused-function warnings without W=1. > > Sometimes, that warning is just a result of missed clean up but there > > have been instances where it was a real bug: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190523010235.GA105588@archlinux-epyc/ > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1558574945-19275-1-git-send-email-skomatineni@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Having warnings not be equal between compilers out of the box causes > > confusion and irritation: https://crbug.com/974884 > > > > Is not the objective of ClangBuiltLinux to rely on GCC less? > > > > The only reason that we see the warnings crop up in i915 is because > > they add -Wall after all of the warnings get disabled (i.e. > > -Wno-unused-function -Wall so -Wunused-function gets enabled again). > > > > To get these warnings after this patch, W=1 has to be used and that > > results in a lot of extra warnings. x86_64 defconfig has one objtool > > warning right now, W=1 adds plenty more (from both -W flags and lack of > > kerneldoc annotations): > > > > https://gist.github.com/175afbca29ead14bd039ad46f4ab0ded > > > > This is just food for thought though. > > So if we took just the hunk against include/linux/compiler_types.h > from this patch, we'd be back in a situation pre-commit-abb2ea7dfd82 > ("compiler, clang: suppress warning for unused static inline > functions"). Hmm... > > I would like to minimize the number of Clang specific warnings that > are disabled in scripts/Makefile.extrawarn. I agree. I do not want to carry this forever. After we clean up the warnings (it may take several development cycles), I want to turn on Wunused-function for all the build mode. > Masahiro, does your patch correctly make -Wunused-function work for > clang at W=1? It looks like -Wunused gets added to warning-1, but > then -Wno-unused-function gets added to KBUILD_CFLAGS after `warning` > does. Will that work correctly? I'd imagine that at W=1, > KBUILD_CFLAGS for clang will look like: > ... -Wunused -Wno-unused-function ... > which is probably not what we want? Hmm? -Wunused is added only when W=1. -Wno-unused-function is added only when W= was not passed. They do not happen at the same time. > -- > Thanks, > ~Nick Desaulniers -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada