> > How is this feature supposed to work for external modules? > > > > klp-convert receives: > > "symbols from vmlinux" + "symbols from no-klp in-tree modules" > > + "symbols from no-klp external modules" ?? > > > > I don't think that this use-case has been previously thought out (Miroslav, > correct me if I'm wrong here.) > > I did just run an external build of a copy of > samples/livepatch/livepatch-annotated-sample.c: > > - modules.livepatch is generated in external dir > - klp-convert is invoked for the livepatch module > - the external livepatch module successfully loads > > But that was only testing external livepatch modules. > > I don't know if we need/want to support general external modules supplementing > Symbols.list, at least for the initial klp-convert commit. I suppose external > livepatch modules would then need to specify additional Symbols.list(s) files > somehow as well. I think we discussed it briefly and decided to postpone it for later improvements. External modules are not so important in my opinion. > > > > BTW, 'Symbols.list' sounds like a file to list out symbols > > for generic purposes, but in fact, the > > file format is very specific for the klp-convert tool. > > Perhaps, is it better to rename it so it infers > > this is for livepatching? What do you think? > > > > I don't know if the "Symbols.list" name and leading uppercase was based on any > convention, but something like symbols.klp would be fine with me. symbols.klp looks ok Miroslav