On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:57 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 22:06:04)
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:24 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:13)
> > > > +
> > > > +static int kunit_try_catch_test_init(struct kunit *test)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct kunit_try_catch_test_context *ctx;
> > > > +
> > > > + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
> > >
> > > Can this fail? Should return -ENOMEM in that case?
> >
> > Yes, I should do that.
>
> Looks like it's asserted to not be an error. If it's pushed into the API
> then there's nothing to do here, and you can have my reviewed-by on this
> patch.
>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cool, thanks!
