Re: [PATCH v3] kbuild: check uniqueness of module names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 8:52 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> On Sat, 18 May 2019 01:07:15 +0900 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > It checks not only real modules, but also built-in modules (i.e.
> > controlled by tristate CONFIG option, but currently compiled with =y).
> > Non-unique names for built-in modules also cause problems because
> > /sys/modules/ would fall over.
> >
> > I tested allmodconfig on the latest kernel, and it detected the
> > following:
>
> A powerpc ppc64_defconfig produces:
>
> warning: same basename if the following are built as modules:
>   arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/nvram.ko
>   drivers/char/nvram.ko
>
> Which is a false positive since
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/Makefile has
>
> # CONFIG_NVRAM is an arch. independent tristate symbol, for pmac32 we really
> # need this to be a bool.  Cheat here and pretend CONFIG_NVRAM=m is really
> # CONFIG_NVRAM=y
> obj-$(CONFIG_NVRAM:m=y)         += nvram.o
>
> Which means that this nvram.o will never be built as a module.
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell


BTW, arm64 defconfig also produces a false positive:

warning: same basename if the following are built as modules:
  arch/arm64/lib/crc32.ko
  lib/crc32.ko

CONFIG_CRC32 is a tristate option, but ARM64 selects CRC32.
So, CRC32 is always =y.


We must stop checking modules.builtin soon.
Sorry about noises.




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada



[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux