On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 3:58 AM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 04:01:16PM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote: > > Add a test for string stream along with a simpler example. > > > > Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > kunit/Kconfig | 12 ++++++ > > kunit/Makefile | 4 ++ > > kunit/example-test.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > kunit/string-stream-test.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 4 files changed, 165 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 kunit/example-test.c > > create mode 100644 kunit/string-stream-test.c > > > > diff --git a/kunit/Kconfig b/kunit/Kconfig > > index 64480092b2c24..5cb500355c873 100644 > > --- a/kunit/Kconfig > > +++ b/kunit/Kconfig > > @@ -13,4 +13,16 @@ config KUNIT > > special hardware. For more information, please see > > Documentation/kunit/ > > > > +config KUNIT_TEST > > + bool "KUnit test for KUnit" > > + depends on KUNIT > > + help > > + Enables KUnit test to test KUnit. > > + > > +config KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST > > + bool "Example test for KUnit" > > + depends on KUNIT > > + help > > + Enables example KUnit test to demo features of KUnit. > > Can't these tests be module? At this time, no. KUnit doesn't support loading tests as kernel modules; it is something we could add in in the future, but I would rather not open that can of worms right now. There are some other things I would like to do that would probably be easier to do before adding support for tests as loadable modules. > > Or am I mis-reading the previous logic? > > Anyway, just a question, nothing objecting to this as-is for now. Cool Cheers!
