On 3/26/19 4:18 PM, Joao Moreira wrote:
On 3/18/19 4:18 PM, Joe Lawrence wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 11:13:05AM -0300, Joao Moreira wrote:
Livepatches may use symbols which are not contained in its own scope,
and, because of that, may end up compiled with relocations that will
only be resolved during module load. Yet, when the referenced symbols are
not exported, solving this relocation requires information on the object
that holds the symbol (either vmlinux or modules) and its position inside
the object, as an object may contain multiple symbols with the same name.
Providing such information must be done accordingly to what is specified
in Documentation/livepatch/module-elf-format.txt.
Currently, there is no trivial way to embed the required information as
requested in the final livepatch elf object. klp-convert solves this
problem in two different forms: (i) by relying on a symbol map, which is
built during kernel compilation, to automatically infers the relocation
targeted symbol, and, when such inference is not possible (ii) by using
annotations in the elf object to convert the relocation accordingly to
the specification, enabling it to be handled by the livepatch loader.
Given the above, add support for symbol mapping in the form of
Symbols.list file; add klp-convert tool; integrate klp-convert tool into
kbuild; make livepatch modules discernible during kernel compilation
pipeline; add data-structure and macros to enable users to annotate
livepatch source code; make modpost stage compatible with livepatches;
update livepatch-sample and update documentation.
The patch was tested under three use-cases:
use-case 1: There is a relocation in the lp that can be automatically
resolved by klp-convert (tested by removing the annotations from
samples/livepatch/livepatch-annotated-sample.c)
use-case 2: There is a relocation in the lp that cannot be automatically
resolved, as the name of the respective symbol appears in multiple
objects. The livepatch contains an annotation to enable a correct
relocation - reproducible with this livepatch sample:
www.livewire.com.br/suse/klp/livepatch-sample.1.c
use-case 3: There is a relocation in the lp that cannot be automatically
resolved similarly as 2, but no annotation was provided in the livepatch,
triggering an error during compilation - reproducible with this livepatch
sample: www.livewire.com.br/suse/klp/livepatch-sample.2.c
In comparison with v1, this version of the patch-set:
- was rebased to kernel 4.19
- adds a Symbols.list versioning information
- brings bug fixes and code improvements to klp-convert sources
This is a patch-set repost, given that a typo in a mail address prevented
the original submission from being posted to lkml.
[ ... snip ... ]
Hi Joao,
Apologies for taking so long to get to this patchset, but I finally
spent last week reviewing and testing. My goal was to write a klp
self-test based on the implementation and your sample module. Along the
way I spotted a few minor bugs and other small suggestions. Instead of
dumping a bunch of code or patch content in my replies, I posted my
rebase and modified branch here:
https://github.com/joe-lawrence/linux/tree/klp-convert-v2-rebase-review
I added subject line [squash] tags to individual commits that should be
considered fixups for patches in this set. Those commit logs also
contain [joe: description] tags and my sign-offs for that purpose as
well.
Hopefully this form of feedback will be easy to digest. I'll reply to
the individual patchs here with high-level comments and a pointer to the
corresponding github patch. Let me know if there are any questions. If
it is easier to simply repost as a v3 with those changes, I can do that
as well -- whichever method is easier for you.
Hi Joe, again thanks a lot for the review. To the things which I had
something to say, I already replied to the respective messages. If none
has issues with the fix for the ppc64le .TOC. symbols issue (on patch
5/8) and with the fix for the multi-used-m Makefile (on patch 2/8), I
guess we are good for moving forward to a v3.
>> If you don't mind, this is fine by me that you squash the changes and
post the newer version. In fact, I can't figure out why my patch
submissions did not appear in lkml (if someone knows what could be the
reason, please, let me know), so I guess it would be nice to have it
reachable this time.
I can do that... what I will do is collate all the comments, squash
revisions, and update logs accordingly. I'll post it up on github to
let the 0-day lkp bot run through it and you can take a look to double
check the series, attributions, etc before I post it here.
BTW, something I *just* noticed when putting together that toy
out-of-tree module to test out multi-object livepatch modules is that we
aren't considering out-of-tree symbols in Symbols.list.
Perhaps we can save that for v4 or beyond, but maybe we want to
re-arrange the klp-convert arguments to "klp-convert <input.ko> <out.ko>
<Symbols.list> [Symbols.list ...]" where we treat everything after
<out.ko> as a symbol list file? (This would assume we would generate a
separate out-of-tree module Symbols.list file.) /thinking-out-loud
-- Joe