Hi folks, here're some patches for polishing up the Debian packaging stuff, so it can be directly used w/ usual Debian machinery like pbuilder, git-buildpackage, dck-buildpackage, etc. These expect debian/rules to exist in the unpacked/patched tree and drive the whole build. Currently 'make deb-pkg' does it in the opposite direction - it creates debian/rules and fills in some data, that's derived from .config etc. My goal is building the kernel package in exactly the same way as any other Debian package - so there must be a debian/rules as the primary entry point. To do that, w/ minimal change and w/o breaking the existing machinery, I'm going in several steps: #1: add Makefile rules for retrieving missing makefile-internal variables kernel config system .config (eg. kernel arch). this could be used for other build systems, too. just call: `make kernelarch` or `make kernellocalversion` #2: add an env variable for changing the name of the rules file generated by mkdebian. When coming from an existing rules file, we can prevent this from being overwritten. #3: add a generic debian/rules file, that calls mkdebian to create the remaining debian control files (w/ rules redirected into nirvana) The existing `make deb-pkg` is bypassed and remains ontouched. One point still puzzling me: once the debian/rules is applied and somebody calls `make deb-pkg`, he'll end up w/ unclean tree, as now a git-tracked file is changed. Perhaps I just change deb-pkg to call debian/rules then, but I'd like to hear your oppinions about this, before. What do you think about that ? --mtx