> On Nov 28, 2018, at 3:09 PM, Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 2018-11-14 6:57 p.m., Nadav Amit wrote: >> Eventually, if you get a fix into icecc, we will need to change the >> Makefile, consider the version number and act accordingly. > > I got a fix pulled into icecc[1] and it works quite well. It ought to be > included in the next version of icecc. And distcc (with pump at least) > has a patch too. In my experience, icecc does a much better job > distributing the kernel build though. > > Logan > > [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ficecc%2Ficecream%2Fpull%2F430&data=02%7C01%7Cnamit%40vmware.com%7C044d795be30143ae26ef08d65586953b%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C636790433884222635&sdata=4h72yLjvOF29kcAC5CM7CB9ukH3HoALNUfgKA62E4Gs%3D&reserved=0 Thanks for taking care of it. This change is certainly simpler and cleaner than the one I came with. So what’s your take? Would you think this patch is still needed? Should it only be enabled automatically for distcc and not for distcc-pump?
