On 14/11/18 06:57 PM, Nadav Amit wrote: > As long as the argument was *required* to get distcc to work at all, you > could expect people would figure out an argument is needed. In this case, I > suspect nobody will ever know about this argument (except you). I agree with this completely. > Eventually, if you get a fix into icecc, we will need to change the > Makefile, consider the version number and act accordingly. Yeah, that's probably a sensible way forward. > Anyhow, I’ll add an argument as you asked, and let Ingo (& others) be the An argument to force it to a regular compile would at least help with experimenting with this stuff. Logan
