On 2018-11-07 11:01 a.m., Nadav Amit wrote:
> Ideas? Do people care about it?
Just spit balling, but is there a reason we didn't just put the macros
for inline assembly directly in the header? Something like this:
asm(".macro ANNOTATE_UNREACHABLE counter:req\n\t"
"\\counter:\n\t"
".pushsection .discard.unreachable\n\t"
".long \\counter\\()b -.\n\t"
".popsection\n\t"
".endm\n");
#define annotate_unreachable() ({ \
asm volatile("ANNOTATE_UNREACHABLE counter=%c0" \
: : "i" (__COUNTER__)); \
})
It does mean the macros won't be usable in non-inline assembly, without
duplicating them, but do we care about that?
I would have expected people compiling the kernel with distcc to be
fairly common -- it certainly speeds up my kernel compiles quite
significantly and thus saves me a lot of time.
Logan
