Let gcc know these cases are meant to fall through to the next label
by annotating them with the new __fallthrough statement attribute;
and remove the comment since it conveys the same information
(which was also parsed by gcc to suppress the warning).
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/auxdisplay/panel.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/auxdisplay/panel.c b/drivers/auxdisplay/panel.c
index 21b9b2f2470a..0755034e49ba 100644
--- a/drivers/auxdisplay/panel.c
+++ b/drivers/auxdisplay/panel.c
@@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ static void panel_process_inputs(void)
break;
input->rise_timer = 0;
input->state = INPUT_ST_RISING;
- /* fall through */
+ __fallthrough;
case INPUT_ST_RISING:
if ((phys_curr & input->mask) != input->value) {
input->state = INPUT_ST_LOW;
@@ -1380,11 +1380,11 @@ static void panel_process_inputs(void)
}
input->high_timer = 0;
input->state = INPUT_ST_HIGH;
- /* fall through */
+ __fallthrough;
case INPUT_ST_HIGH:
if (input_state_high(input))
break;
- /* fall through */
+ __fallthrough;
case INPUT_ST_FALLING:
input_state_falling(input);
}
--
2.17.1
