Hello Helen,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 1:18 AM Helen Koike <helen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Leonardo,
>
> Thanks for the patch, just some small comments below.
>
> On 10/16/18 9:09 PM, Leonardo Brás wrote:
> > Changes the usage of DEF_FIELD_ADDR in this function to create a
> > reference and operate over it using an aux variable.
> > It also changes the loop logic used to find duplicates, to avoid
> > creating another variable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leonardo Brás <leobras.c@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > scripts/mod/file2alias.c | 14 ++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/mod/file2alias.c b/scripts/mod/file2alias.c
> > index 7be43697ff84..9ea1db2aefdb 100644
> > --- a/scripts/mod/file2alias.c
> > +++ b/scripts/mod/file2alias.c
> > @@ -641,25 +641,27 @@ static void do_pnp_card_entries(void *symval, unsigned long size,
> > unsigned int i;
> >
> > device_id_check(mod->name, "pnp", size, id_size, symval);
> > + DEF_FIELD_ADDR(symval, pnp_card_device_id, devs);
> > + typeof(devs) devs_last;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> > unsigned int j;
> > - DEF_FIELD_ADDR(symval + i*id_size, pnp_card_device_id, devs);
> > + devs_last = devs + i * id_size;
> >
> > for (j = 0; j < PNP_MAX_DEVICES; j++) {
> > - const char *id = (char *)(*devs)[j].id;
> > - int i2, j2;
> > + const char *id = (char *)(*devs_last)[j].id;
> > + int j2;
> > int dup = 0;
> >
> > if (!id[0])
> > break;
> >
> > /* find duplicate, already added value */
> > - for (i2 = 0; i2 < i && !dup; i2++) {
> > - DEF_FIELD_ADDR(symval + i2*id_size, pnp_card_device_id, devs);
> > + while ((devs_last -= id_size) >= devs) {
>
> You forgot to consider the dup variable.
Sorry, I did not get it. Could you explain it?
> Also you inverted the order of this loop, I am not sure this is
> important (I just took a quick look) but you need to be careful.
It seems to be looking for a duplicate. I don't think inverting will
break anything.
But I will give a better look anyway.
>
> This is also hard to read,
Humm, IMO it looks easier to read this way. But ok, I can change it back.
> I would define another variant macro where
> you can set any name of the variable, e.g.
>
> #define DEF_FIELD_ADDR_VAR(m, devid, f, var) \
> typeof(((struct devid *)0)->f) *var = ((m) + OFF_##devid##_##f)
>
> In this way you don't need to change the logic, just the name of the
> variable.
>
Good suggestion. Is it ok to create a macro for using only once?
It looks like its not worth the trouble.
> >
> > for (j2 = 0; j2 < PNP_MAX_DEVICES; j2++) {
> > - const char *id2 = (char *)(*devs)[j2].id;
> > + const char *id2 =
> > + (char *)(*devs_last)[j2].id;
> >
> > if (!id2[0])
> > break;
> >
>
> Regards,
> Helen
Thank you for reviewing,
Leonardo Bras
