Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > 2018-07-09 20:39 GMT+09:00 Dirk Gouders <dirk@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >> Dirk Gouders <dirk@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Dirk Gouders <dirk@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>>> Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>> >>>>> syncconfig updates the .config only when sym_change_count > 0, i.e. >>>>> any change in config symbols has been detected. >>>>> >>>>> Not only symbols but also comments are contained in the .config file. >>>>> If only comments are updated, they are not fed back to the .config, >>>>> then the stale comments are left-over. Of course, this is just a >>>>> matter of comments, but why not fix it. >>>> >>>> Hello Masahiro, >>>> >>>> I am currently looking at and testing this series. >>>> >>>> First: For this patch I would suggest to also edit the syncconfig >>>> section of "conf --help". >>>> >>>> Further, on a slow laptop, I was suspecting, this patch to cause full >>>> rebuilds of everything, each time I ran "make syncconfig" followed by >>>> "make" but could not verify this on another machine, so perhaps I am >>>> just (for testing purposes) removing the wrong files (modules.builtin >>>> for example) -- I am still testing. >>>> >>>> But, what irritates me with testing is that (also without your >>>> patches) two consecutive "make" produce different output, one of them >>>> always shows a warning and this is reproducable. I just want to make >>>> sure there is no other problem that influences my testing: >>>> >>>> $ make >>>> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh >>>> DESCEND objtool >>>> CHK include/generated/compile.h >>>> DATAREL arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux >>>> Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#15) >>>> Building modules, stage 2. >>>> MODPOST 211 modules >>>> >>>> $ make >>>> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh >>>> DESCEND objtool >>>> CHK include/generated/compile.h >>>> LD arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux >>>> ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.head.text' >>>> ld: warning: creating a DT_TEXTREL in object. >>>> ZOFFSET arch/x86/boot/zoffset.h >>>> AS arch/x86/boot/header.o >>>> LD arch/x86/boot/setup.elf >>>> OBJCOPY arch/x86/boot/setup.bin >>>> OBJCOPY arch/x86/boot/vmlinux.bin >>>> BUILD arch/x86/boot/bzImage >>>> Setup is 15580 bytes (padded to 15872 bytes). >>>> System is 8069 kB >>>> CRC e01d75ec >>>> Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#15) >>>> Building modules, stage 2. >>>> MODPOST 211 modules >>> >>> I spent some more time with the behaviour described above and bisected >>> to the commit after that two consecutive invocations of "make" (on an >>> already compiled tree) seem to do different things. That commit is >>> 98f78525371b55cc (x86/boot: Refuse to build with data relocations), so I >>> put Kees and Ingo on CC. >>> >>> I did the bisecting on another system, so I'll provide the output of two >>> consecutive "make" on an already compiled tree on that machine: >>> >>> $ make >>> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh >>> DESCEND objtool >>> CHK include/generated/compile.h >>> DATAREL arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux >>> Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#48) >>> Building modules, stage 2. >>> MODPOST 165 modules >>> >>> $ make >>> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh >>> DESCEND objtool >>> CHK include/generated/compile.h >>> LD arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux >>> ZOFFSET arch/x86/boot/zoffset.h >>> AS arch/x86/boot/header.o >>> LD arch/x86/boot/setup.elf >>> OBJCOPY arch/x86/boot/setup.bin >>> OBJCOPY arch/x86/boot/vmlinux.bin >>> BUILD arch/x86/boot/bzImage >>> Setup is 15644 bytes (padded to 15872 bytes). >>> System is 6663 kB >>> CRC 3eb90f40 >>> Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#48) >>> Building modules, stage 2. >>> MODPOST 165 modules >>> >>> If I comment out $(call if_changed,check_data_rel) in >>> arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile, two consecutive "make" produce >>> identical output i.e. seem to not do different things: >>> >>> $ make >>> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh >>> DESCEND objtool >>> CHK include/generated/compile.h >>> Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#49) >>> Building modules, stage 2. >>> MODPOST 165 modules >>> >>> $ make >>> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh >>> DESCEND objtool >>> CHK include/generated/compile.h >>> Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#49) >>> Building modules, stage 2. >>> MODPOST 165 modules >>> >>> So, I guess this different behaviour of two consecutive "make" is not >>> intentional but I am failing to understand why it happens. >> >> I think, I solved the puzzle and perhaps, that saves others some time: >> >> The problem is that "if_changed" was not designed for multiple use >> inside a recipe and in the case of compressed/vmlinux, the 2-fold use >> created a kind of flip-flop for situations when nothing has to be done >> to build the target. >> >> Because each of the two users of "if_changed" stores it's footprint in >> .vmlinux.cmd but that file then isn't re-read, one of the two >> "if_changed" calculates that nothing has to be done wheras the other one >> recognizes a change in the commandline, because it sees the command-line >> for the other part of the reciepe. >> >> In the next make, the roles flip, because the previously satisfied >> "if_changed" now sees the command-line of the other one. And so on... >> >> I am not a Kbuild expert but the attached patch fixes that problem by >> introducing "if_changed_multi" that accepts two commands -- one whose >> commandline should be checked and a second one that should be >> executed. > > > if_changed should not appear multiple times in one target. > > I think the simplest fix-up is to > create a new command that combines > 'cmd_check_data_rel' and 'cmd_ld'. > > > quiet_cmd_link-vmlinux = LD $@ > cmd_link-vmlinux = $(cmd_check_data_rel); $(cmd_ld) > > $(obj)/vmlinux: $(vmlinux-objs-y) FORCE > $(call if_changed,link-vmlinux) > > Kbuild also supports if_changed_rule, > but the usage is more complex. > > There are only a few usages: > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v4.17/scripts/Makefile.build#L288 Just for completeness I will copy in part of a reply from Kees that shows how double-colon rules can also avoid multiple use of if_changed for one target: -$(obj)/vmlinux: $(vmlinux-objs-y) FORCE - $(call if_changed,check_data_rel) +$(obj)/vmlinux:: $(vmlinux-objs-y) + $(call cmd,check_data_rel) +$(obj)/vmlinux:: $(vmlinux-objs-y) FORCE $(call if_changed,ld) The combined command seems to have the advantage that every command to build the target gets recorded in the .cmd file A search showed me that we have two more users that use if_changed more than once for a single target: arch/microblaze/boot/Makefile (fourfold) arch/sparc/boot/Makefile (2 times twofold) The sparc case seems to apply to any of the two suggested fixes, but microblaze uses if_changed in a pattern rule and also makes use of parameter arguments in the sub-commands: $(obj)/simpleImage.%: vmlinux FORCE $(call if_changed,cp,.unstrip) $(call if_changed,objcopy) $(call if_changed,uimage) $(call if_changed,strip,.strip) @echo 'Kernel: $(UIMAGE_OUT) is ready' ' (#'`cat .version`')' In this case, double colons would have a different meaning and the combined command solution would result in a change of the sub-commands, as well. I note this in case Michal perhaps has other preferences. In addition to extend the documentation, we could modify if_changed to warn about it is being used more than once for a target: # Execute command if command has changed or prerequisite(s) are updated. if_changed = $(if $(filter-out undefined,$(origin if_changed_$@)), \ @set -e; \ echo "Warning: $@: multiple use of if_changed!" >&2; , \ @set -e $(eval if_changed_$@ := 1) ; ) \ $(if $(strip $(any-prereq) $(arg-check)), \ $(echo-cmd) $(cmd_$(1)); \ printf '%s\n' 'cmd_$@ := $(make-cmd)' > $(dot-target).cmd, :) But this fires only if if_changed is actually called and it defines many variables for just that purpose, so this is perhaps not what we want... Dirk -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html