RE: [PATCHv4 4/4] ARM: versatile: support configuring versatile machine for no-MMU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday, June 22, 2018 1, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> All that is possible already. But config symbol mutual exclusion is not.

I still don't understand why we need some false sense of security for 
only selecting 1 platform.

There are probably plenty of kernel config options that you could enable
that would break any number of systems.

So, why do we feel that XIP_KERNEL needs a warm safety blanket around 
it?

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux&nblp;USB Development]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Secrets]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux