On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:59 PM, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:48 PM H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 06/13/18 14:05, Nick Desaulniers wrote: >> > From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > i386 and x86-64 uses different registers for arguments; make them >> > available so we don't have to #ifdef in the actual code. >> > >> > Native size and specified size (q, l, w, b) versions are provided. >> > >> > Suggested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> I still object to Suggested-by: here. Sedat did a correction, which is >> a Reviewed-by:, but unless I'm completely out to sea, there was no >> suggestion on Sedat's part of this; and I had certainly not seen it when >> I wrote the code. > > I'm fine with changing it from a Suggested-by to a Reviewed-by. Can > you do that when you apply the set, or should I send a v6? > Hi, this issue with Clang and Paravirt is such an ancient issue. Back to the days in 2011 before LLVMlinux was born, the project was called lll-project. Fact is the issue is today fixed. Not sure about the credits Suggested-by/Reviewed-by in the Linux-kernel development process. I did not count the number of compiler runs here. A Tested-by is OK for me. Anyway, the beast is dead, this counts for me. Regards, - Sedat - -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
