On 05/30/2018 05:00 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > What about the architectures not touched by your patch that previously > had no -m32/-m64? (arc, c6x, h8300, hexagon, m68k, microblaze, nds32, > nios2, openrisc, powerpc, riscv, s390, sh, unicore32, xtensa) > > You forgot to CC them on this patch. A) He cc'd arch/sh on the previous patch earlier today, to which I replied: https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=152769132515226&w=2 B) Every change to common infrastructure should cc: every arch? Really? So like filesystem changes and stuff to? > Have you really checked that all their toolchains support the -m32/-m64 > flags you newly introduce for them? Apart from non-biarch architectures, > I'm thinking of 31-bit s390 as a corner case where !64 != 32. 1) Last I heard Linux implements lp64: http://www.unix.org/whitepapers/64bit.html 2) it's unlikely to be worse than it was before the patch, 3) last I checked https://github.com/landley/mkroot boots to an s390 shell prompt under qemu, although I haven't tried building with this patch. (And you may still need to add HOST_EXTRA='lex yacc bison flex' to the command line unless they've re-added the _shipped versions like the old kconfig had...) Point is, shouldn't be too hard to test it. Presumably that's why we have an -rc1 and then 6 more -rc versions each release... Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
