On 05/05/2018 04:57 PM, Du, Changbin wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 10:28:23AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> On Thu, 3 May 2018 21:45:46 +0800 >> "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> With that gcc comment, I still think CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_DEBUG is more >>>> inline with what it is and understandable than >>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_EXPERIENCE. The "OPTIMIZE" is the key word there. >>>> >>>> -- Steve >>> What about CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_DEBUGGING? We alreay have >>> CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE and CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE. >> >> Yes I like that much better. >> >>> >>> And do we need to move it to existing configuration menu "General setup-> >>> Compiler optimization level"? But I also want it appear in "kernel hacking" >>> since this is a debug option. >> >> I understand why you would want it by debugging, but I think it does >> make more sense to be included with the above two other options, as >> they are all mutually exclusive. mm, sounds good. >> This brings up the topic of creating config paradigms. That is, a way >> of saying "I want a debug kernel" and select one option that selects >> everything you would expect. Or perhaps we should have a: >> >> make debug_config Sometimes I want to build allmodconfig-minus-debug options ... but not all debug options. I still want debugfs but most options that end with _DEBUG are disabled. I.e., I don't want the options that cause big run-time slowdowns. (unless I cause that by printing some debugfs contents) Can merge_config.sh (or one of its cousins) help with that? > Agree, I accomplish this by running script scripts/kconfig/merge_config.sh. > >> that does it. >> >> But that's a different topic. For now, I would just included it in >> init/Kconfig, and not worry about it not showing up in kernel hacking. Ack. thanks. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
