Hi Ulf, On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:09:50AM +0100, Ulf Magnusson wrote: > IMO, we could take this as is (after addressing other people's > comments), since it's already a big improvement, and then add sorting > later if we feel like it. > > Don't have to do everything at once. :) I agree that it's not possible to do everything perfect right from the start. But since we are changing the user experience, I just thought that we would first like to see how both implementations (prefixed vs grouped tokens) look like, then make a decision (I'm still open minded about it), then affect the users. > > Think it should be pretty straightforward to add the kind of sorting > you had in mind at least, by changing PRINT_ALL_SELECTS into > PRINT_INACTIVE_SELECTS in [1], and tweaking some conditions. Yep. Thanks to your support, I've pushed v3, where you've already provided your review findings, which I'm going to fix soon :) Thanks, Eugeniu. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html