On Thu, 04 Jan 2018, Knut Omang <knut.omang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 17:50 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Thu, 04 Jan 2018, Knut Omang <knut.omang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Add scripts/runchecks which has generic support for running >> > checker tools in a convenient and user friendly way that >> > the author hopes can contribute to rein in issues detected >> > by these tools in a manageable and convenient way. >> > >> > scripts/runchecks provides the following basic functionality: >> > >> > * Makes it possible to selectively suppress output from individual >> > checks on a per file or per subsystem basis. >> > * Unifies output and suppression input from different tools >> > by providing a single unified syntax and presentation for the >> > underlying tools in the style of "scripts/checkpatch.pl --show-types". >> > * Allows selective run of one, or more (or all) configured tools >> > for each file. >> > >> > In the Makefile system, the sparse specific setup has been replaced >> > by setup for runchecks. >> > >> > This version of runchecks together with a "global" configuration >> > file in "scripts/runchecks.cfg" supports sparse, checkpatch, and checkdoc, >> > a trivial abstraction above a call to 'kernel-doc -none'. >> > It also supports forwarding calls to coccicheck for coccinelle support >> > but this is not quite as worked through as the three other checkers, >> > mainly because of lack of error data as all checks pass by default >> > right now. >> > >> > The code is designed to be easily extensible to support more checkers >> > as they emerge, and some generic checker support is even available >> > just via simple additions to "scripts/runchecks.cfg". >> > >> > The runchecks program unifies configuration, processing >> > and output for multiple checker tools to make them >> > all run as part of the C=1 or C=2 option to make. >> > >> > Currently with full support and unified behaviour for >> > sparse: sparse >> > checkpatch: scripts/checkpatch.pl >> > checkdoc: kernel-doc -none >> > >> > In principle supported but not unified in output(yet): >> > coccinelle: scripts/coccicheck >> > >> > Introduces a new documentation section titled >> > "Makefile support for running checkers" >> > >> > Also updates documentation for the make C= option >> > in some other doc files, as the behaviour has >> > been changed to be less sparse specific and more >> > generic. The coccinelle documentation also had the >> > behaviour of C=1 and C=2 swapped. >> >> I'm surprised the commit message and the provided documentation say >> nothing about using CHECK=foo on the command line. That already supports >> arbitrary checkers. > > The problem, highlighted by Jim Davis in > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/20/638 > > is that the current solution isn't flexible enough - that discussion > is what lead me to this reimplementation of what I originally intended > to be a checkpatch only solution. > >> How does this relate to that? Is this supposed to be >> a complete replacement? Or what? > > It has evolved into a complete replacement of the intention of CHECK. > >> 'make help' also references $CHECK, and this patch doesn't update the >> help text. > > I realize now that this needs to be handled in some way due to the way I split the > arguments with '--' - the intention was to keep it for bw compatibility. > > It would be good to know if people rely on using CHECK with C={1,2} for > anything beside the checkers supported by runchecks today, if not, > it could either be removed or simply replace by an expansion into a '--run:$CHECK' > argument to runchecks > > Then runchecks' implicit method of declaring > > checker <checkername> <full-path-to-checker> > > in scripts/runchecks.cfg could be used for people with checkers that > need no further input/output adaptation. > > Further suggestions appreciated on this matter. FWIW, I'd think it would be sufficient the documentation ('make help' and your runchecks.rst et al) gets updated to reflect the changes to $CHECK. But up to whoever is the maintainer here. > >> > Signed-off-by: Knut Omang <knut.omang@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > Reviewed-by: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > Reviewed-by: Åsmund Østvold <asmund.ostvold@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > Reviewed-by: John Haxby <john.haxby@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst | 12 +- >> > Documentation/dev-tools/index.rst | 1 +- >> > Documentation/dev-tools/runchecks.rst | 215 ++++++++- >> > Documentation/dev-tools/sparse.rst | 30 +- >> > Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.txt | 9 +- >> > Makefile | 23 +- >> > scripts/Makefile.build | 4 +- >> > scripts/runchecks | 734 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> > scripts/runchecks.cfg | 63 ++- >> > scripts/runchecks_help.txt | 43 ++- >> >> Please get rid of runchecks_help.txt and use the usual python mechanisms >> to specify and parse command line options, with their help texts, >> including automated --help output. This keeps the implementation and the >> help together, with hopes they'll actually stay in sync. Please don't >> hand roll argument parsers in python. > > Hmm - I have been burnt by the use of unstable interfaces in Python before, > when I needed it to work on a (Linux) system with Python v.2.6.x only > - argparse was introduced in v.2.7. and alternative choices are not > at all clear to me, see for instance: > > https://dmerej.info/blog/post/docopt-v-argparse/ > > If this program was part of a "standalone" python project with a well defined python > environment, I would probably have used argparse, which I have used in other projects. > > In fact I hesitated even to use python for this, because of fear of versioning issues.. > When I was tempted anyway, and after looking at the existing examples in scripts/ > ruling out python v.3.x, it felt safer to stay with the bare minimum of module > features for this simple logic. > > I do feel confident that the benefits of python for this outweighs the drawbacks > compared to my initial shell script implementation, or using perl or even C. > > Further advice on this appreciated, Again, I can only offer my opinion of requiring Python v2.7 and using argparse, but it doesn't carry much weight. Up to the kbuild maintainers. BR, Jani. > > Thanks, > Knut > >> >> BR, >> Jani. >> >> > 10 files changed, 1114 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >> > create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/runchecks.rst >> > create mode 100755 scripts/runchecks >> > create mode 100644 scripts/runchecks.cfg >> > create mode 100644 scripts/runchecks_help.txt >> > >> > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst b/Documentation/dev- >> tools/coccinelle.rst >> > index 94f41c2..c98cc44 100644 >> > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst >> > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst >> > @@ -157,17 +157,19 @@ For example, to check drivers/net/wireless/ one may write:: >> > >> > make coccicheck M=drivers/net/wireless/ >> > >> > -To apply Coccinelle on a file basis, instead of a directory basis, the >> > -following command may be used:: >> > +To apply Coccinelle as the only checker on a file basis, >> > +instead of a directory basis, the following command may be used:: >> > >> > - make C=1 CHECK="scripts/coccicheck" >> > + make C=2 CF="--run:coccicheck" >> > >> > -To check only newly edited code, use the value 2 for the C flag, i.e.:: >> > +To check only newly edited code, use the value 1 for the C flag, i.e.:: >> > >> > - make C=2 CHECK="scripts/coccicheck" >> > + make C=1 CF="--run:coccicheck" >> > >> > In these modes, which works on a file basis, there is no information >> > about semantic patches displayed, and no commit message proposed. >> > +For more information about options in this calling mode, see >> > +Documentation/dev-tools/runchecks.rst . >> > >> > This runs every semantic patch in scripts/coccinelle by default. The >> > COCCI variable may additionally be used to only apply a single >> > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/index.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/index.rst >> > index e313925..cb4506d 100644 >> > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/index.rst >> > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/index.rst >> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ whole; patches welcome! >> > >> > coccinelle >> > sparse >> > + runchecks >> > kcov >> > gcov >> > kasan >> > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/runchecks.rst b/Documentation/dev- >> tools/runchecks.rst >> > new file mode 100644 >> > index 0000000..1a43c05 >> > --- /dev/null >> > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/runchecks.rst >> > @@ -0,0 +1,215 @@ >> > +.. Copyright 2017 Knut Omang <knut.omang@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > + >> > +Makefile support for running checkers >> > +===================================== >> > + >> > +Tools like sparse, coccinelle, and scripts/checkpatch.pl are able to detect a >> > +lot of syntactic and semantic issues with the code, and are also constantly >> > +evolving and detecting more. In an ideal world, all source files should >> > +adhere to whatever rules imposed by checkpatch.pl and sparse etc. with all >> > +bells and whistles enabled, in a way that these checkers can be run as a reflex >> > +by developers (and by bots) from the top level Makefile for every changing >> > +source file. In the real world however there's a number of challenges: >> > + >> > +* Sometimes there are valid reasons for accepting violations of a checker >> > + rule, even if that rule is a sensible one in the general case. >> > +* Some subsystems have different restrictions and requirements. >> > + (Ideally, the number of subsystems with differing restrictions and >> > + requirements will diminish over time.) >> > +* Similarly, the kernel contains a lot of code that predates the tools, or at >> > + least some of the newer rules, and we would like these tools to evolve without >> > + requiring the need to fix all issues detected with it in the same commit. >> > + We also want to accommodate new tools, so that each new tool does not >> > + have to reinvent its own mechanism for running checks. >> > +* On the other hand, we want to make sure that files that are clean >> > + (to some well defined extent, such as passing checkpatch or sparse >> > + with checks only for certain important types of issues) keep being so. >> > + >> > +This is the purpose of ``scripts/runchecks``. >> > + >> > +The ``runchecks`` program looks for files named ``runchecks.cfg`` in the >> > +``scripts`` directory, then in the directory hierarchy of the source file, >> > +starting from where the source file is located, searching upwards. If at least >> > +one such file exists in the source tree, ``runchecks`` parses a set of >> > +rules from it, and uses them to determine how to invoke a set of individual >> > +checker tools for a particular file. The kernel Makefile system supports >> > +this feature as an integrated part of compiling the code, using the >> > +``C={1,2}`` option. With:: >> > + >> > + make C=1 >> > + >> > +runchecks will be invoked if the file needs to be recompiled. With :: >> > + >> > + make C=2 >> > + >> > +runchecks will be invoked for all source files, even if they do not need >> > +recompiling. Based on the configuration, ``runchecks`` will invoke one or >> > +more checkers. The number and types of checkers to run are configurable and >> > +can also be selected on the command line:: >> > + >> > + make C=2 CF="--run:sparse,checkpatch" >> > + >> > +If only one checker is run, any parameter that is not recognized by >> > +``runchecks`` itself will be forwarded to the checker. If more than one checker >> > +is enabled, parameters can be forwarded to a specific checker by means of >> > +this syntax:: >> > + >> > + make C=2 CF="--to-checkpatch:--terse" >> > + >> > +A comma separated list of parameters can be supplied if necessary. >> > + >> > +Supported syntax of the runchecks.cfg configuration file >> > +-------------------------------------------------------- >> > + >> > +The ``runchecks`` configuration file chain can be used to set policies and "rein in" >> > +checker errors piece by piece for a particular subsystem or driver. It can >> > +also be used to mitigate and extend checkers that do not support >> > +selective suppression of all it's checks. >> > + >> > +Two classes of configuration are available. The first class is configuration >> > +that defines what checkers are enabled, and some logic to allow better >> > +suppression or a more unified output of warning messages. >> > +This type of configuration should go into the first accessed >> > +configuration file, and has been preconfigured for the currently supported >> > +checkers in ``scripts/runchecks.cfg``. The second class is the features for >> > +configuring the output of the checkers by selectively suppressing checks on >> > +a per file or per check basis. These typically go in the source tree in >> > +the directory of the source file or above. Some of the syntax is generic >> > +and some is only supported by some checkers. >> > + >> > +For the first class of configuration the following syntax is supported:: >> > + >> > + # comments >> > + checker checkpatch [command] >> > + addflags <list of extra flags and parameters> >> > + cflags >> > + typedef NAME <regular expression> >> > + run [checker list|all] >> > + >> > +The ``checker`` command switches ``runchecks``'s attention to a particular >> > +checker. The following commands until the next ``checker`` statement >> > +apply to that particular checker. The first occurrence of ``checker`` >> > +also serves as a potentially defining operation, if the checker name >> > +has not been preconfigured. In that case, a second parameter can be used >> > +to provide the name of the command used to run the checker. >> > +A full checker integration into runchecks will typically require some >> > +additions to runchecks, and will then have been preconfigured, >> > +but simple checkers might just be configured on the fly. >> > + >> > +The ``addflags`` command incrementally adds more flags and parameters to >> > +the command line used to invoke the checker. This applies to all >> > +invocations of the checker from runchecks. >> > + >> > +The ``cflags`` command forwards all the flags and options passed to >> > +the compiler invocation to the checker. The default is to suppress these >> > +parameters when invoking the checker. >> > + >> > +The ``typedef`` command adds ``NAME`` and associates it with the given regular >> > +expression. This expression is used to match against standard error output from >> > +the checker. In the kernel tree, ``NAME`` can then be used in local >> > +``runcheck.cfg`` files as a new named check that runchecks understands and that >> > +can be used with checker supported names below to selectively suppress that >> > +particular set of warning or error messages. This is useful to handle output >> > +checks for which the underlying checker does not provide any suppression. Check >> > +type namespaces are separate for the individual checkers. You can list the state >> > +of the built in and configured checker and check types with:: >> > + >> > + scripts/runchecks --list >> > + >> > +The checker implementations of the ``typedef`` command also allow runchecks to >> > +perform some unification of output by rewriting the output lines, and use of the >> > +new type names in the error output, to ease the process of updating the >> > +runchecks.cfg files. It also adds some limited optional color support. Having >> > +a unified representation of the error output also makes it much easier to do >> > +statistics or other operations on top of an aggregated output from several >> > +checkers. >> > + >> > +For the second class of configuration the following syntax is supported:: >> > + >> > + # comments >> > + checker checker_name >> > + except check_type [files ...] >> > + pervasive check_type1 [check_type2 ...] >> > + line_len <n> >> > + >> > +The ``except`` directive takes a check type such as for example >> > +``MACRO_ARG_REUSE``, and a set of files that should not be subject to this >> > +particular check type. The ``pervasive`` command disables the listed types >> > +of checks for all the files in the subtree. The ``except`` and >> > +``pervasive`` directives can be used cumulatively to add more exceptions. >> > +The ``line_len`` directive defines the upper bound of characters per line >> > +tolerated in this directory. Currently only ``checkpatch`` supports this >> > +command. >> > + >> > +Options when running checker programs from make >> > +----------------------------------------------- >> > + >> > +A make variable ``CF`` allows passing additional parameters to >> > +``runchecks``. You can for instance use:: >> > + >> > + make C=2 CF="--run:checkpatch --fix-inplace" >> > + >> > +to run only the ``checkpatch`` checker, and to have checkpatch try to fix >> > +issues it finds - *make sure you have a clean git tree and carefully review >> > +the output afterwards!* Combine this with selectively enabling of types of >> > +errors via changes under ``checker checkpatch`` to the local >> > +``runchecks.cfg``, and you can focus on fixing up errors subsystem or >> > +driver by driver on a type by type basis. >> > + >> > +By default runchecks will skip all files if a ``runchecks.cfg`` file cannot >> > +be found in the directory of the file or in the tree above. This is to >> > +allow builds with ``C=2`` to pass even for subsystems that have not yet done >> > +anything to rein in checker errors. At some point when all subsystems and >> > +drivers either have fixed all checker errors or added proper >> > +``runchecks.cfg`` files, this can be changed. >> > +Note that the runchecks.cfg file in the scripts/ directory is special, in that >> > +it can be present without triggering checker runs in the main kernel tree. >> > + >> > +To force runchecks to run a full run in directories/trees where runchecks >> > +does not find a ``runchecks.cfg`` file as well, use:: >> > + >> > + make C=2 CF="-f" >> > + >> > +If you like to see all the warnings and errors produced by the checkers, ignoring >> > +any runchecks.cfg files except the one under ``scripts``, you can use:: >> > + >> > + make C=2 CF="-n" >> > + >> > +or for a specific module directory:: >> > + >> > + make C=2 M=drivers/infiniband/core CF="--color -n -w" >> > + >> > +with the -w option to ``runchecks`` to suppress errors from any of the >> > +checkers and just continue on, and the ``--color`` option to present errors >> > +with colors where supported. >> > + >> > +Ever tightening checker rules >> > +----------------------------- >> > + >> > +Commit the changes to the relevant ``runchecks.cfg`` together with the code >> > +changes that fixes a particular type of issue, this will allow automatic >> > +checker running by default. This way we can ensure that new errors of that >> > +particular type do not inadvertently sneak in again! This can be done at >> > +any subsystem or module maintainer's discretion and at the right time >> > +without having to do it all at the same time. >> > + >> > +Before submitting your changes, verify that a full "make C=2" passes >> > +with no errors. >> > + >> > +Extending and improving checker support in ``runchecks`` >> > +-------------------------------------------------------- >> > + >> > +The runchecks program has been written with extensibility in mind. >> > +If the checker starts its reporting lines with filename:lineno, there's a >> > +good chance that a new checker can simply be added by adding:: >> > + >> > + checker mychecker path_to_mychecker >> > + >> > +to ``scripts/runchecks.cfg`` and suitable ``typedef`` expressions to provide >> > +selective suppressions of output, however it is likely that some quirks are >> > +needed to make the new checker behave similarly to the others, and to support >> > +the full set of features, such as the ``--list`` option. This is done by >> > +implementing a new subclass of the Checker class in ``runchecks``. This is the >> > +way all the available default supported checkers are implemented, and those >> > +relatively lean implementations could serve as examples for support for future >> > +checkers. >> > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/sparse.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/sparse.rst >> > index 78aa00a..e3e8b27 100644 >> > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/sparse.rst >> > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/sparse.rst >> > @@ -101,5 +101,31 @@ recompiled, or use "make C=2" to run sparse on the files whether >> they need to >> > be recompiled or not. The latter is a fast way to check the whole tree if you >> > have already built it. >> > >> > -The optional make variable CF can be used to pass arguments to sparse. The >> > -build system passes -Wbitwise to sparse automatically. >> > +The "make C={1,2}" form of kernel make indirectly calls sparse via "runchecks", >> > +which dependent on configuration and command line options may dispatch calls to >> > +other checkers in addition to sparse. Details on how this works is covered >> > +in Documentation/dev-tools/runchecks.rst . >> > + >> > +The optional make variable CF can be used to pass arguments to runchecks for dispatch >> > +to sparse. If sparse is the only tool enabled, any option not recognized by >> > +runchecks will be forwarded to sparse. If more than one tool is active, you must >> > +add the parameters you want sparse to get as a comma separated list prefixed by >> > +``--to-sparse:``. If you want sparse to be the only checker run, and you want >> > +some nice colored output, you can specify this as:: >> > + >> > + make C=2 CF="--run:sparse --color" >> > + >> > +This will cause sparse to be called for all files which are supported by a valid >> > +runchecks configuration (again see Documentation/dev-tools/runchecks.rst for >> > +details). If you want to run sparse on all files and ignore any missing >> > +configuration files(s), just add ``-n`` to the list of options passed to >> > +runchecks. This will cause runchecks to call sparse with all errors enabled for >> > +all files even if no valid configuration is found in the tree for the source files. >> > + >> > +By default "runchecks" is set to enable all sparse errors, but you can >> > +configure what checks to be applied by sparse on a per file or per subsystem >> > +basis. With the above invocation, make will fail and stop on the first file >> > +encountered with sparse errors or warnings in it. If you want to continue >> > +anyway, you can use:: >> > + >> > + make C=2 CF="--run:sparse --color -w" >> > diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.txt b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.txt >> > index ac2363e..260e688 100644 >> > --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.txt >> > +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.txt >> > @@ -103,10 +103,13 @@ CROSS_COMPILE is also used for ccache in some setups. >> > >> > CF >> > -------------------------------------------------- >> > -Additional options for sparse. >> > -CF is often used on the command-line like this: >> > +Additional options for runchecks, the generic checker runner. >> > +CF is often used on the command-line for instance like this: >> > >> > - make CF=-Wbitwise C=2 >> > + make C=2 CF="--run:sparse --color -w" >> > + >> > +to run the sparse tool only, and to use colored output and continue on warnings >> > +or errors. >> > >> > INSTALL_PATH >> > -------------------------------------------------- >> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile >> > index eb1f597..bba07b9 100644 >> > --- a/Makefile >> > +++ b/Makefile >> > @@ -159,14 +159,22 @@ ifeq ($(skip-makefile),) >> > # so that IDEs/editors are able to understand relative filenames. >> > MAKEFLAGS += --no-print-directory >> > >> > -# Call a source code checker (by default, "sparse") as part of the >> > -# C compilation. >> > +# Do source code checking as part of the C compilation. >> > +# >> > # >> > # Use 'make C=1' to enable checking of only re-compiled files. >> > # Use 'make C=2' to enable checking of *all* source files, regardless >> > # of whether they are re-compiled or not. >> > # >> > -# See the file "Documentation/dev-tools/sparse.rst" for more details, >> > +# Source code checking is done via the runchecks script, which >> > +# has knowledge of each individual cheker and how it wants to be called, >> > +# as well as options for rules as to which checks that are applicable >> > +# to different parts of the kernel, at source file granularity. >> > +# >> > +# Several types of checking is available, and custom checkers can also >> > +# be added. >> > +# >> > +# See the file "Documentation/dev-tools/runchecks.rst" for more details, >> > # including where to get the "sparse" utility. >> > >> > ifeq ("$(origin C)", "command line") >> > @@ -383,10 +391,9 @@ INSTALLKERNEL := installkernel >> > DEPMOD = /sbin/depmod >> > PERL = perl >> > PYTHON = python >> > -CHECK = sparse >> > >> > -CHECKFLAGS := -D__linux__ -Dlinux -D__STDC__ -Dunix -D__unix__ \ >> > - -Wbitwise -Wno-return-void $(CF) >> > +CHECK = $(srctree)/scripts/runchecks >> > +CHECKFLAGS = >> > NOSTDINC_FLAGS = >> > CFLAGS_MODULE = >> > AFLAGS_MODULE = >> > @@ -429,7 +436,7 @@ GCC_PLUGINS_CFLAGS := >> > export ARCH SRCARCH CONFIG_SHELL HOSTCC HOSTCFLAGS CROSS_COMPILE AS LD CC >> > export CPP AR NM STRIP OBJCOPY OBJDUMP HOSTLDFLAGS HOST_LOADLIBES >> > export MAKE AWK GENKSYMS INSTALLKERNEL PERL PYTHON UTS_MACHINE >> > -export HOSTCXX HOSTCXXFLAGS LDFLAGS_MODULE CHECK CHECKFLAGS >> > +export HOSTCXX HOSTCXXFLAGS LDFLAGS_MODULE CHECK CHECK_CFLAGS CHECKFLAGS >> > >> > export KBUILD_CPPFLAGS NOSTDINC_FLAGS LINUXINCLUDE OBJCOPYFLAGS LDFLAGS >> > export KBUILD_CFLAGS CFLAGS_KERNEL CFLAGS_MODULE CFLAGS_KASAN CFLAGS_UBSAN >> > @@ -778,7 +785,7 @@ endif >> > >> > # arch Makefile may override CC so keep this after arch Makefile is included >> > NOSTDINC_FLAGS += -nostdinc -isystem $(call shell-cached,$(CC) -print-file- >> name=include) >> > -CHECKFLAGS += $(NOSTDINC_FLAGS) >> > +CHECK_CFLAGS += $(NOSTDINC_FLAGS) >> > >> > # warn about C99 declaration after statement >> > KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Wdeclaration-after-statement,) >> > diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.build b/scripts/Makefile.build >> > index cb8997e..13325b3 100644 >> > --- a/scripts/Makefile.build >> > +++ b/scripts/Makefile.build >> > @@ -93,10 +93,10 @@ __build: $(if $(KBUILD_BUILTIN),$(builtin-target) $(lib-target) >> $(extra-y)) \ >> > ifneq ($(KBUILD_CHECKSRC),0) >> > ifeq ($(KBUILD_CHECKSRC),2) >> > quiet_cmd_force_checksrc = CHECK $< >> > - cmd_force_checksrc = $(CHECK) $(CHECKFLAGS) $(c_flags) $< ; >> > + cmd_force_checksrc = $(CHECK) $(CF) $< -- $(CHECKFLAGS) $(c_flags); >> > else >> > quiet_cmd_checksrc = CHECK $< >> > - cmd_checksrc = $(CHECK) $(CHECKFLAGS) $(c_flags) $< ; >> > + cmd_checksrc = $(CHECK) $(CF) $< -- $(CHECKFLAGS) $(c_flags); >> > endif >> > endif >> > >> > diff --git a/scripts/runchecks b/scripts/runchecks >> > new file mode 100755 >> > index 0000000..4dd2969 >> > --- /dev/null >> > +++ b/scripts/runchecks >> > @@ -0,0 +1,734 @@ >> > +#!/usr/bin/python >> > + >> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> > +# >> > +# Copyright (c) 2017, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. >> > +# Author: Knut Omang <knut.omang@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > +# >> > +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >> > +# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 >> > +# as published by the Free Software Foundation. >> > + >> > +# The program implements a generic and extensible code checker runner >> > +# that supports running various checker tools from the kernel Makefile >> > +# or standalone, with options for selectively suppressing individual >> > +# checks on a per file or per check basis. >> > +# >> > +# The program has some generic support for checkers, but to implement >> > +# support for a new checker to the full extent, it might be necessary to >> > +# 1) subclass the Checker class in this file with checker specific processing. >> > +# 2) add typedef definitions in runchecks.cfg in this directory >> > +# >> > +# This version of runchecks has full support for the following tools: >> > +# sparse: installed separately >> > +# checkpatch: checkpatch.pl >> > +# checkdoc: kernel-doc -none >> > +# >> > +# See file "Documentation/dev-tools/runchecks.rst" for more details >> > +# >> > + >> > +import sys, os, subprocess, fcntl, select, re >> > +from os.path import dirname, basename >> > + >> > +class CheckError(Exception): >> > + def __init__(self, value): >> > + self.value = value >> > + def __str__(self): >> > + return self.value >> > + >> > +def usage(): >> > + manual = os.path.join(srctree, "scripts/runchecks_help.txt") >> > + f = open(manual, "r") >> > + for line in f: >> > + sys.stdout.write(line) >> > + f.close() >> > + print "" >> > + print "Configured checkers:" >> > + for (c, v) in checker_types.iteritems(): >> > + enabled = "[default disabled]" >> > + for c_en in config.checkers: >> > + if c_en.name == c: >> > + enabled = "" >> > + break >> > + print " %-20s %s" % (c, enabled) >> > + exit(1) >> > + >> > + >> > +# A small configuration file parser: >> > +# >> > +class Config: >> > + def __init__(self, srctree, workdir, filename): >> > + self.path = [] >> > + self.relpath = {} >> > + relpath = "" >> > + >> > + # Look for a global config file in the scripts directory: >> > + file = os.path.join(srctree, "scripts/%s" % filename) >> > + if os.path.exists(file): >> > + self.path.append(file) >> > + self.relpath[file] = relpath >> > + >> > + while not ignore_config: >> > + self.file = os.path.join(workdir,filename) >> > + if os.path.exists(self.file): >> > + self.path.append(self.file) >> > + self.relpath[self.file] = relpath >> > + if len(workdir) <= len(srctree): >> > + break >> > + relpath = "%s/%s" % (basename(workdir), relpath) >> > + workdir = dirname(workdir) >> > + >> > + self.checkers = [] >> > + self.cur_chk = None >> > + self.color = False >> > + self.list_only = False >> > + >> > + self.command = { >> > + "checker" : self.checker, >> > + "addflags" : self.addflags, >> > + "run" : self.runlist, >> > + "except" : self.exception, >> > + "pervasive" : self.pervasive, >> > + "cflags" : self.cflags, >> > + "typedef" : self.typedef >> > + } >> > + >> > + if verbose: >> > + print " ** runchecks: config path: %s" % self.path >> > + for f in self.path: >> > + self.ParseConfig(f) >> > + >> > + def checker(self, argv): >> > + try: >> > + self.cur_chk = checker_types[argv[0]] >> > + except KeyError: >> > + if len(argv) < 2: >> > + d1 = "generic checker configurations!" >> > + raise CheckError("%s:%d: use 'checker %s command' for %s" % \ >> > + (self.file, self.lineno, argv[0], d1)) >> > + >> > + AddChecker(Checker(argv[0], argv[1], srctree, workdir)) >> > + self.cur_chk = checker_types[argv[0]] >> > + >> > + def addflags(self, argv): >> > + self.cur_chk.addflags(argv) >> > + >> > + def exception(self, argv): >> > + type = argv[0] >> > + if self.cur_chk: >> > + relpath = self.relpath[self.file] >> > + self.cur_chk.exception(type, relpath, argv[1:]) >> > + else: >> > + raise CheckError("%s:%d: checker has not been set" % (self.file, >> self.lineno)) >> > + >> > + def pervasive(self, argv): >> > + self.cur_chk.pervasive(argv) >> > + >> > + def runlist(self, argv): >> > + try: >> > + for c in argv: >> > + self.checkers.append(checker_types[c]) >> > + except KeyError, k: >> > + if str(k) == "'all'": >> > + self.checkers = checker_types.values() >> > + else: >> > + available = "\n -- avaliable checkers are: %s" % >> ",".join(checker_types.keys()) >> > + raise CheckError("Checker %s not found - not configured?%s" % >> (str(k), available)) >> > + >> > + def cflags(self, argv): >> > + self.cur_chk.cflags = True >> > + >> > + def typedef(self, argv): >> > + self.cur_chk.typedef(argv) >> > + >> > + # Parse one configuration file in the configuration file list: >> > + # >> > + def ParseConfig(self, file): >> > + f = open(file, 'r') >> > + self.file = file >> > + self.lineno = 0 >> > + for line in f: >> > + self.lineno = self.lineno + 1 >> > + token = line.split() >> > + if len(token) < 1: >> > + continue >> > + if token[0][0] == '#': >> > + continue >> > + try: >> > + self.command[token[0]](token[1:]) >> > + except KeyError: >> > + if not self.cur_chk: >> > + raise CheckError("%s:%s: checker has not been set" % (self.file, >> self.lineno)) >> > + self.cur_chk.ParseOptional(token[0], token[1:]) >> > + except AttributeError: >> > + if not self.cur_chk: >> > + raise CheckError("%s:%s: checker has not been set" % (self.file, >> self.lineno)) >> > + >> > + f.close() >> > + self.cur_chk = None >> > + >> > + # Option forwarding to checkers >> > + # and optional selection of which checkers to run: >> > + def ProcessOpts(self, opts): >> > + for opt in opts: >> > + if opt == "--color": >> > + self.color = True >> > + continue >> > + elif opt == "--list": >> > + self.list_only = True >> > + continue >> > + elif opt == "--help": >> > + usage_only = True >> > + >> > + fw = re.match("^--to-(\w+):(.*)$", opt) >> > + if fw: >> > + try: >> > + cname = fw.group(1) >> > + checker = checker_types[cname] >> > + except: >> > + raise CheckError("Unknown checker '%s' specified in option '%s'" >> % (cname, opt)) >> > + newargs = fw.group(2).split(',') >> > + checker.cmdvec += newargs >> > + if verbose: >> > + print "Added extra args for %s: %s" % (cname, newargs) >> > + continue >> > + >> > + runopt = re.match("^--run:(.*)$", opt) >> > + if runopt: >> > + clist = runopt.group(1).split(",") >> > + # Command line override: reset list of checkers >> > + self.checkers = [] >> > + self.runlist(clist) >> > + continue >> > + >> > + if len(self.checkers) == 1: >> > + # If only one checker enabled, just pass everything we don't know >> about through: >> > + self.checkers[0].cmdvec.append(opt) >> > + else: >> > + raise CheckError("Unknown option '%s'" % opt) >> > + >> > + # We always expect at least one config file that sets up the active checkers: >> > + # >> > + def HasPathConfig(self): >> > + return len(self.path) > 1 >> > + >> > + >> > +# The base class for checkers: >> > +# For specific support a particular checker, implement a subclass of this: >> > +# >> > +class Checker: >> > + def __init__(self, name, cmd, srctree, workdir, ofilter = None, efilter = None): >> > + self.name = name >> > + self.srctree = srctree >> > + self.workdir = workdir >> > + self.efilter = efilter >> > + if ofilter: >> > + self.ofilter = ofilter >> > + else: >> > + self.ofilter = self.suppress >> > + self.strout = "" >> > + self.strerr = "" >> > + self.cflags = False >> > + if cmd[0:7] == "scripts": >> > + cmd = os.path.join(self.srctree, cmd) >> > + self.cmd = cmd >> > + self.cmdvec = cmd.split() >> > + self.pervasive_opts = [] # "global" ignore list >> > + self.exceptions = [] # exception list for this file >> > + self.file_except = [] # Aggregated list of check types to ignore for this >> file >> > + self.re_except_def = {} # check_type -> <regex to match it in stderr> >> > + self.doc = {} # Used when parsing documentation: check type >> -> doc string >> > + self.cont = [] >> > + self.last_ignore = False >> > + self.unclassified = 0 # With RegexFilter: Number of "red" lines not >> classified >> > + >> > + def filter_env(self, dict): >> > + return dict >> > + >> > + def readline(self, is_stdout, fd): >> > + tmp_str = "" >> > + try: >> > + s = os.read(fd, 1000) >> > + while s != '': >> > + tmp_str += s >> > + s = os.read(fd, 1) >> > + except OSError: >> > + None >> > + >> > + if is_stdout: >> > + self.strout += tmp_str >> > + tmp_str = self.strout >> > + else: >> > + self.strerr += tmp_str >> > + tmp_str = self.strerr >> > + >> > + inx = tmp_str.find('\n') + 1 >> > + if inx != 0: >> > + t = tmp_str[:inx] >> > + if is_stdout: >> > + self.strout = tmp_str[inx:] >> > + else: >> > + self.strerr = tmp_str[inx:] >> > + else: >> > + return '' >> > + return t >> > + >> > + def SetNonblocking(self, fd): >> > + fl = fcntl.fcntl(fd, fcntl.F_GETFL) >> > + try: >> > + fcntl.fcntl(fd, fcntl.F_SETFL, fl | os.O_NDELAY) >> > + except AttributeError: >> > + fcntl.fcntl(fd, fcntl.F_SETFL, fl | fcntl.FNDELAY) >> > + >> > + def Run(self, file, verbose): >> > + cmdvec = self.cmdvec >> > + if self.cflags: >> > + cmdvec += c_argv >> > + if not force: >> > + self.file_except = set(self.exceptions + self.pervasive_opts) >> > + self.Postprocess() >> > + if not file: >> > + raise CheckError("error: missing file parameter") >> > + cmdvec.append(file) >> > + if debug: >> > + print " ** running %s: %s" % (self.name, " ".join(cmdvec)) >> > + elif verbose: >> > + print " -- checker %s --" % self.name >> > + try: >> > + ret = self.RunCommand(cmdvec, self.ofilter, self.efilter) >> > + except OSError, e: >> > + if re.match(".*No such file or directory", str(e)): >> > + if len(config.checkers) == 1: >> > + raise CheckError("Failed to run checker %s: %s: %s" % (self.name, >> self.cmd, str(e))) >> > + if verbose: >> > + print " ** %s does not exist - ignoring %s **" % (self.name, >> self.cmd) >> > + return 0 >> > + ret = self.PostRun(ret) >> > + return ret >> > + >> > + def RunCommand(self, cmdvec, ofilter, efilter): >> > + my_env = self.filter_env(os.environ) >> > + child = subprocess.Popen(cmdvec, shell = False, \ >> > + stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE, cwd=".", >> env=my_env) >> > + sout = child.stdout >> > + serr = child.stderr >> > + ofd = sout.fileno() >> > + efd = serr.fileno() >> > + oeof = False >> > + eeof = False >> > + check_errors = [] >> > + self.SetNonblocking(ofd) >> > + self.SetNonblocking(efd) >> > + while True: >> > + ready = select.select([ofd,efd],[],[],0.1) >> > + if ofd in ready[0]: >> > + if child.poll() != None: >> > + oeof = True >> > + oline = self.readline(True, ofd) >> > + while oline != '': >> > + if ofilter: >> > + ofilter(oline, verbose) >> > + else: >> > + sys.stdout.write(oline) >> > + oline = self.readline(True, ofd) >> > + if efd in ready[0]: >> > + if child.poll() != None: >> > + eeof = True >> > + eline = self.readline(False, efd) >> > + while eline != '': >> > + if efilter: >> > + check_err = efilter(eline, verbose) >> > + if check_err != None: >> > + check_errors.append(check_err) >> > + else: >> > + sys.stderr.write(eline) >> > + eline = self.readline(False, efd) >> > + if oeof and eeof: >> > + break >> > + serr.close() >> > + sout.close() >> > + retcode = child.wait() >> > + if check_errors != []: >> > + estr = "".join(check_errors) >> > + if estr != "": >> > + sys.stderr.write(estr) >> > + if not retcode: >> > + retcode = 131 >> > + else: >> > + if verbose: >> > + print "%s ** %d suppressed errors/warnings from %s%s" % (BLUE, >> len(check_errors), self.name, ENDCOLOR) >> > + retcode = 0 >> > + return retcode >> > + >> > + def ParseOptional(self, cmd, argv): >> > + raise CheckError("Undefined command '%s' for checker '%s'" % (cmd, >> self.name)) >> > + >> > + # Called as final step before running the checker: >> > + def Postprocess(self): >> > + # Do nothing - just for redefinition in subclasses >> > + return >> > + >> > + # Called as a post processing step after running the checker: >> > + # Input parameter is return value from Run() >> > + def PostRun(self, retval): >> > + # Do nothing - just for redefinition in subclasses >> > + return retval >> > + >> > + # Default standard output filter: >> > + def suppress(self, line, verbose): >> > + if verbose: >> > + sys.stdout.write(line) >> > + >> > + # A matching filter for stderr: >> > + def RegexFilter(self, line, verbose): >> > + if self.cont: >> > + m = re.match(self.cont[0], line) >> > + self.cont = self.cont[1:] >> > + if m: >> > + if self.last_ignore: >> > + return "" >> > + else: >> > + return line >> > + >> > + for t, regex in self.re_except_def.iteritems(): >> > + r = "^(.*:\d+:)\s(\w+:)\s(%s.*)$" % regex[0] >> > + m = re.match(r, line) >> > + if m: >> > + if len(regex) > 1: >> > + self.cont = regex[1:] >> > + if t in self.file_except: >> > + self.last_ignore = True >> > + return "" >> > + else: >> > + self.last_ignore = False >> > + return "%s%s %s:%s%s%s: %s %s\n" % (BROWN, m.group(1), >> self.name.upper(), BLUE, t, ENDCOLOR, m.group(2), m.group(3)) >> > + self.unclassified = self.unclassified + 1 >> > + return RED + line + ENDCOLOR >> > + >> > + def ListTypes(self): >> > + if len(self.re_except_def) > 0: >> > + print BLUE + BOLD + " Check types declared for %s in runchecks >> configuration%s" % (self.name, ENDCOLOR) >> > + for t, regex in self.re_except_def.iteritems(): >> > + print "\t%-22s %s" % (t, "\\n".join(regex)) >> > + if len(self.re_except_def) > 0: >> > + print "" >> > + return 0 >> > + >> > + def addflags(self, argv): >> > + self.cmdvec += argv >> > + >> > + def exception(self, type, relpath, argv): >> > + for f in argv: >> > + if f == ("%s%s" % (relpath, bfile)): >> > + self.exceptions.append(type) >> > + >> > + def pervasive(self, argv): >> > + self.pervasive_opts += argv >> > + >> > + def typedef(self, argv): >> > + exp = " ".join(argv[1:]) >> > + elist = exp.split("\\n") >> > + self.re_except_def[argv[0]] = elist >> > + >> > + >> > +# Individual checker implementations: >> > +# >> > + >> > +# checkpatch >> > +class CheckpatchRunner(Checker): >> > + def __init__(self, srctree, workdir): >> > + Checker.__init__(self, "checkpatch", "scripts/checkpatch.pl", srctree, >> workdir) >> > + self.cmdvec.append("--file") >> > + self.line_len = 0 >> > + # checkpatch sends all it's warning and error output to stdout, >> > + # redirect and do limited filtering: >> > + self.ofilter = self.out_filter >> > + >> > + def ParseOptional(self, cmd, argv): >> > + if cmd == "line_len": >> > + self.line_len = int(argv[0]) >> > + else: >> > + Checker.ParseOptional(self, cmd, argv) >> > + >> > + def Postprocess(self): >> > + if config.color: >> > + self.cmdvec.append("--color=always") >> > + if self.line_len: >> > + self.cmdvec.append("--max-line-length=%d" % self.line_len) >> > + if self.file_except: >> > + self.cmdvec.append("--ignore=%s" % ",".join(self.file_except)) >> > + >> > + # Extracting a condensed doc of types to filter on: >> > + def man_filter(self, line, verbose): >> > + t = line.split() >> > + if len(t) > 1 and t[1] != "Message": >> > + sys.stdout.write("\t%s\n" % t[1]) >> > + >> > + def out_filter(self, line, verbose): >> > + # --terse produces this message even with no errors, >> > + # suppress unless run with -v: >> > + if not verbose and re.match("^total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks,", line): >> > + return >> > + sys.write.stderr(line) >> > + >> > + def ListTypes(self): >> > + print BLUE + BOLD + " Supported check types for checkpatch" + ENDCOLOR >> > + # Parse help output: >> > + cmdvec = ["%s/scripts/checkpatch.pl" % self.srctree, "--list-types"] >> > + self.RunCommand(cmdvec, self.man_filter, None) >> > + print "" >> > + return 0 >> > + >> > +# sparse >> > +class SparseRunner(Checker): >> > + def __init__(self, srctree, workdir): >> > + Checker.__init__(self, "sparse", "sparse", srctree, workdir) >> > + self.efilter = self.RegexFilter >> > + >> > + def sparse_name(self, rs_type): >> > + l_name = rs_type.lower() >> > + s_name = "" >> > + for c in l_name: >> > + if c == '_': >> > + s_name += '-' >> > + else: >> > + s_name += c >> > + return s_name >> > + >> > + def runchecks_name(self, sparse_type): >> > + u_name = sparse_type.upper() >> > + rc_name ="" >> > + for c in u_name: >> > + if c == '-': >> > + rc_name += '_' >> > + else: >> > + rc_name += c >> > + return rc_name >> > + >> > + def Postprocess(self): >> > + if self.file_except: >> > + for e in self.file_except: >> > + self.cmdvec.append("-Wno-%s" % self.sparse_name(e)) >> > + >> > + # Extracting a condensed doc of types to filter on: >> > + def man_filter(self, line, verbose): >> > + if self.doc_next: >> > + doc = line.strip() >> > + self.doc[self.doc_next] = doc >> > + self.doc_next = False >> > + return >> > + match = re.search("^\s+-W([\w-]+)\s*$", line) >> > + if match: >> > + name = match.group(1) >> > + if re.match("sparse-", name): >> > + return >> > + rs_type = self.runchecks_name(name) >> > + self.doc_next = rs_type >> > + >> > + def ListTypes(self): >> > + # Parse manual output: >> > + cmdvec = ["man", "sparse"] >> > + self.doc_next = False >> > + ret = self.RunCommand(cmdvec, self.man_filter, None) >> > + if ret: >> > + return ret >> > + print BLUE + BOLD + "\n Types derived from sparse from documentation in >> manpage" + ENDCOLOR >> > + for t, doc in self.doc.iteritems(): >> > + print "\t%-22s %s" % (t, doc) >> > + try: >> > + regex = self.re_except_def[t] >> > + print "\t%-22s %s" % ("", GREEN + "\\n".join(regex) + ENDCOLOR) >> > + except: >> > + print "\t%-22s %s" % ("", RED + "(regex match (typedef) missing)" + >> ENDCOLOR) >> > + print BLUE + BOLD + "\n Types for sparse only declared for runchecks or not >> documented in manpage" + ENDCOLOR >> > + for t, regex in self.re_except_def.iteritems(): >> > + try: >> > + self.doc[t] >> > + except: >> > + print "\t%-22s %s" % (t, GREEN + "\\n".join(regex) + ENDCOLOR) >> > + print "" >> > + return 0 >> > + >> > +# checkdoc >> > +class CheckdocRunner(Checker): >> > + def __init__(self, srctree, workdir): >> > + Checker.__init__(self, "checkdoc", "scripts/kernel-doc", srctree, workdir) >> > + self.cmdvec.append("-none") >> > + self.efilter = self.RegexFilter >> > + >> > +# coccicheck (coccinelle) (WIP) >> > +class CoccicheckRunner(Checker): >> > + def __init__(self, srctree, workdir): >> > + Checker.__init__(self, "coccicheck", "scripts/coccicheck", srctree, workdir) >> > + self.debug_file = None >> > + self.efilter = self.CoccicheckFilter >> > + >> > + def filter_env(self, dict): >> > + newdict = os.environ >> > + # If debug file is not set by the user, override it and present the output on >> stderr: >> > + try: >> > + df = newdict["DEBUG_FILE"] >> > + except: >> > + print "*** debug_file!" >> > + self.debug_file = '/tmp/cocci_%s.log' % os.getpid() >> > + newdict["DEBUG_FILE"] = self.debug_file >> > + return newdict >> > + >> > + def CoccicheckFilter(self, line, verbose): >> > + self.unclassified = self.unclassified + 1 >> > + if re.match(".*spatch -D report", line): >> > + if verbose: >> > + sys.stdout.write(line) >> > + else: >> > + return RED + line + ENDCOLOR >> > + >> > + def PostRun(self, retval): >> > + if not self.debug_file: >> > + return retval >> > + f = open(self.debug_file) >> > + for line in f: >> > + line = self.CoccicheckFilter(line, verbose) >> > + if line: >> > + sys.stderr.write(line) >> > + f.close() >> > + if self.debug_file: >> > + os.remove(self.debug_file) >> > + if retval == 0: >> > + reval = ret >> > + return retval >> > + >> > +checker_types = {} >> > + >> > +def AddChecker(checker): >> > + checker_types[checker.name] = checker >> > + >> > +# >> > +# Start main program: >> > +# >> > +program = os.path.realpath(sys.argv[0]) >> > +progname = basename(program) >> > +scriptsdir = dirname(program) >> > +srctree = dirname(scriptsdir) >> > +force = False >> > +ignore_config = False >> > +verbose = False >> > +debug = False >> > +error = True >> > +error_on_red = False >> > +usage_only = False >> > +argv = [] >> > +c_argv = [] >> > +fw_opts = [] >> > +workdir = os.getcwd() >> > +optarg = False >> > +argc = 0 >> > + >> > +AddChecker(CheckpatchRunner(srctree, workdir)) >> > +AddChecker(SparseRunner(srctree, workdir)) >> > +AddChecker(CheckdocRunner(srctree, workdir)) >> > +AddChecker(CoccicheckRunner(srctree, workdir)) >> > + >> > +for arg in sys.argv[1:]: >> > + argc = argc + 1 >> > + >> > + if arg == "--": >> > + argc = argc + 1 >> > + c_argv = sys.argv[argc:] >> > + break; >> > + elif arg == "-f": >> > + force = True >> > + elif arg == "-n": >> > + ignore_config = True >> > + force = True >> > + elif arg == "-w": >> > + error = False >> > + elif arg == "-t": >> > + error_on_red = True >> > + error = False >> > + elif arg == "-d": >> > + debug = True >> > + elif arg == "-v": >> > + verbose = True >> > + elif arg == "-h": >> > + usage_only = True >> > + else: >> > + opt = re.match("^-.*$", arg) >> > + if opt: >> > + # Delay processing of these until we know the configuration: >> > + fw_opts.append(opt.group(0)) >> > + else: >> > + argv.append(arg) >> > + >> > +if not verbose: >> > + try: >> > + verb = int(os.environ["V"]) >> > + if verb != 0: >> > + verbose = True >> > + except KeyError: >> > + verbose = False >> > + >> > +if not os.path.exists(os.path.join(srctree, "MAINTAINERS")): >> > + srctree = None >> > + >> > +try: >> > + file = argv[0] >> > + bfile = basename(file) >> > + workdir = dirname(file) >> > +except: >> > + bfile = None >> > + file = None >> > + >> > +unclassified = 0 >> > + >> > +if debug: >> > + print "Kernel root:\t%s\nFile:\t\t%s\nWorkdir:\t%s" % \ >> > + (srctree, bfile, workdir) >> > + print "C args:\t\t%s\nargv:\t\t%s\n" % (" ".join(c_argv), " ".join(argv)) >> > + >> > +try: >> > + config = Config(srctree, workdir, "runchecks.cfg") >> > + config.ProcessOpts(fw_opts) >> > + >> > + if usage_only: >> > + usage() >> > + if not config.HasPathConfig() and not config.list_only and not force: >> > + if verbose: >> > + print " ** %s: No configuration found - skip checks for %s" % (progname, >> file) >> > + exit(0) >> > + >> > + if config.color: >> > + GREEN = '\033[32m' >> > + RED = '\033[91m' >> > + BROWN = '\033[33m' >> > + BLUE = '\033[34m' >> > + BOLD = '\033[1m' >> > + ENDCOLOR = '\033[0m' >> > + else: >> > + BOLD = '' >> > + GREEN = '' >> > + RED = '' >> > + BROWN = '' >> > + BLUE = '' >> > + ENDCOLOR = '' >> > + >> > + ret = 0 >> > + for checker in config.checkers: >> > + if config.list_only: >> > + ret = checker.ListTypes() >> > + else: >> > + ret = checker.Run(file, verbose) >> > + unclassified += checker.unclassified >> > + if ret and error: >> > + break >> > + >> > + if not error and not (error_on_red and unclassified > 0): >> > + ret = 0 >> > +except CheckError, e: >> > + print " ** %s: %s" % (progname, str(e)) >> > + ret = 22 >> > +except KeyboardInterrupt: >> > + if verbose: >> > + print " ** %s: Interrupted by user" % progname >> > + ret = 4 >> > + >> > +exit(ret) >> > diff --git a/scripts/runchecks.cfg b/scripts/runchecks.cfg >> > new file mode 100644 >> > index 0000000..c0b12cf >> > --- /dev/null >> > +++ b/scripts/runchecks.cfg >> > @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ >> > +checker checkpatch >> > +addflags --quiet --show-types --strict --emacs >> > +line_len 110 >> > + >> > +checker sparse >> > +addflags -D__linux__ -Dlinux -D__STDC__ -Dunix -D__unix__ -Wsparse-all >> > +cflags >> > + >> > +# Name Regular expression for matching in checker output >> > +typedef DECL symbol '.*' was not declared. Should it be static\? >> > +typedef SHADOW symbol '\w+' shadows an earlier one\n.*originally >> declared here >> > +typedef TYPESIGN incorrect type in argument \d+ \(different >> signedness\)\n.*expected\n.*got >> > +typedef RETURN_VOID returning void-valued expression >> > +typedef SIZEOF_BOOL expression using sizeof bool >> > +typedef CONTEXT context imbalance in '.*' >> > +typedef MEMCPY_MAX_COUNT \w+ with byte count of >> > +typedef CAST_TO_AS cast adds address space to expression >> > +typedef ADDRESS_SPACE incorrect type in .* \(different address >> spaces\)\n.*expected\n.*got >> > +typedef PTR_INHERIT incorrect type in .* \(different base >> types\)\n.*expected\n.*got >> > +typedef PTR_SUBTRACTION_BLOWS potentially expensive pointer subtraction >> > +typedef VLA Variable length array is used >> > +typedef OVERFLOW constant [x\dA-F]+ is so big it is \w+ >> > +typedef TAUTOLOGICAL_COMPARE self-comparison always evaluates to (true|false) >> > +typedef NON_POINTER_NULL Using plain integer as NULL pointer >> > +typedef BOOL_CAST_RESTRICTED restricted \w+ degrades to integer >> > +typedef TYPESIGN incorrect type in .* \(different >> signedness\)\n.*expected\n.*got >> > +typedef FUNCTION_REDECL symbol '.*' redeclared with different type \(originally >> declared at >> > +typedef COND_ADDRESS_ARRAY the address of an array will always evaluate as true >> > +typedef BITWISE cast (to|from) restricted >> > + >> > +# Type names invented here - not maskable from sparse? >> > +typedef NO_DEREF dereference of noderef expression >> > +typedef ARG_TYPE_MOD incorrect type in .* \(different >> modifiers\)\n.*expected\n.*got >> > +typedef ARG_TYPE_COMP incorrect type in .* \(incompatible >> .*\(.*\)\)\n.*expected\n.*got >> > +typedef ARG_AS_COMP incompatible types in comparison expression \(different >> address spaces\) >> > +typedef CMP_TYPE incompatible types in comparison expression \(different base >> types\) >> > +typedef SPARSE_OFF "Sparse checking disabled for this file" >> > +typedef CAST_TRUNC cast truncates bits from constant value >> > +typedef CAST_FROM_AS cast removes address space of expression >> > +typedef EXT_LINK_DEF function '\w+' with external linkage has definition >> > +typedef FUNC_ARITH arithmetics on pointers to functions >> > +typedef CALL_NO_TYPE call with no type! >> > +typedef FUNC_SUB subtraction of functions\? Share your drugs >> > +typedef STRING_CONCAT trying to concatenate \d+-character string \(\d+ bytes >> max\) >> > +typedef INARG_DIRECTIVE directive in argument list >> > +typedef NONSCALAR_CAST cast (to|from) non-scalar >> > + >> > +checker checkdoc >> > +typedef PARAM_DESC No description found for parameter >> > +typedef X_PARAM Excess function parameter >> > +typedef X_STRUCT Excess struct member >> > +typedef FUN_PROTO cannot understand function prototype >> > +typedef DOC_FORMAT Incorrect use of kernel-doc format >> > +typedef BAD_LINE bad line >> > +typedef AMBIGUOUS Cannot understand.*\n on line >> > +typedef BOGUS_STRUCT Cannot parse struct or union >> > +typedef DUPL_SEC duplicate section name >> > + >> > +checker coccicheck >> > +cflags >> > + >> > +run sparse checkpatch checkdoc >> > +#run all >> > diff --git a/scripts/runchecks_help.txt b/scripts/runchecks_help.txt >> > new file mode 100644 >> > index 0000000..a0a4a34 >> > --- /dev/null >> > +++ b/scripts/runchecks_help.txt >> > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ >> > +Usage: runchecks [<options>] c_file [-- <c_parameters>] >> > + - run code checkers in a conformant way. >> > + >> > +Options: >> > + -h|--help List this text >> > + --list List the different configured checkers and the list of interpreted >> check >> > + types for each of them. >> > + -- Separator between parameters to runchecks and compiler parameters >> to be >> > + passed directly to the checkers. >> > + --run:[checker1[,checker2..]|all] >> > + Override the default set of checkers to be run for each source file. >> By >> > + default the checkers to run will be the intersection of the checkers >> > + configured by ``run`` commands in the configuration file and the >> > + checkers that is actually available on the machine. Use 'all' >> > + to run all the configured checkers. >> > + --color Use coloring in the error and warning output. In this mode >> > + output from checkers that are supported by typedefs but not >> > + captured by any such will be highlighted in red to make it >> > + easy to detect that a typedef rule is missing. See -t below. >> > + -f Force mode: force runchecks to run a full run in >> directories/trees >> > + where runchecks does not find a runchecks.cfg file. The >> default >> > + behaviour is to skip running checkers in directories/trees >> > + where no matching runchecks.cfg file is found either in the >> > + source file directory or above. >> > + -n Ignore all runchecks.cfg files except the one in scripts, >> > + which are used for basic runchecks configuration. This allows >> > + an easy way to run a "bare" version of checking where all >> > + issues are reported, even those intended to be suppressed. >> > + Implicitly enables force mode. >> > + -w Behave as if 0 on exit from all checkers. Normally >> > + runchecks will fail on the first checker to produce errors or >> > + warnings, in fact anything that produces not suppressed >> > + output on stderr. This is to make it easy to work interactively, >> > + avoiding overlooking anything, but sometimes it is useful to >> > + be able to produce a full report of status. >> > + -t Typedef setup mode: For checkers where runchecks enable typedefs: >> > + Behaves as -w except for stderr output that is not captured >> > + by any typedefs. This is a convenience mode while >> > + fixing/improving typedef setup. Use with --color to get red >> > + output for the statements to capture with new typedefs. >> > + -v Verbose output. Also enabled if called from make with V=1, >> > + but it is useful to be able to only enable verbose mode for >> runchecks. >> > + -d Debugging output - more verbose. >> -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
