On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 01:21:39PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > Do you have any kind of numbers for this, out of curiosity? Binary > size, performance, build time? I don't have performance numbers to share. Are there any specific benchmarks you'd be interested in seeing? Build time typically increases with LTO and in my experience, binary size tends to increase by ~10-15% as well. > Why is this needed? It would have been nice to get rid of the > !THIN_ARCHIVES option if you can make the patches work with the thin > archives paths. I believe LLVMgold doesn't know how to deal with an archive of LLVM IR files, but I can certainly use thin archives as an index and extract the path names for linking. I'll look into it. Sami -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
