On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Julia,
>
>
> 2017-11-14 18:07 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx>:
> >> coccicheck failed
> >> $ cat cocci-debug.txt
> >> /home/masahiro/bin/spatch -D report --no-show-diff --very-quiet
> >> --cocci-file scripts/coccinelle/null/badzero.cocci --dir . -I
> >> ./arch/x86/include -I ./arch/x86/include/generated -I ./include -I
> >> ./arch/x86/include/uapi -I ./arch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I
> >> ./include/uapi -I ./include/generated/uapi --include
> >> ./include/linux/kconfig.h --jobs 8 --chunksize 1
> >> Fatal error: exception
> >> Yes_prepare_ocamlcocci.LinkFailure("/tmp/ocaml_cocci_18c9f9.cmxs")
> >
> > Does your Coccinelle support OCaml? I'm not sure what is the proper way to
> > check for this, but in my coccinelle/config.log file I have
> >
> > FEATURE_OCAML='1'
>
>
> Yes. I also see this line in my config.log
>
>
> > spatch --version gives:
> >
> > spatch version 1.0.6-00147-g19f9421 compiled with OCaml version 4.02.3
> > Flags passed to the configure script: [none]
> > Python scripting support: yes
> > Syntax of regular expresssions: Str
>
> My version output looks like follows:
>
> $ spatch --version
> spatch version 1.0.6-00345-g2ca0bef compiled with OCaml version 4.02.3
> Flags passed to the configure script: --prefix=/home/masahiro
> Python scripting support: yes
> Syntax of regular expresssions: PCRE
>
>
> > I'm not sure why it doesn't give feedback on whether OCaml scripting is
> > supported. I will check on this.
Can you try the following semantic patch (called eg nothing.cocci):
@script:ocaml@
@@
()
on any .c file, ie
spatch --sp-file nothing.cocci test.c
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
