Hi Kees,
2017-10-18 5:06 GMT+09:00 Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:53:10 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 08:47:06PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> To clarify: with my gcc-4.9/gcc-5 build, -mstack-protector-guard=tls
>>> >> has no effect,
>>> >> the output is the same as with -mstack-protector-guard=global using the Ubuntu
>>> >> compilers of the same version.
>>> >
>>> > Jumping in here... on IRC Arnd suggested reverting 123c48cf899d
>>> > ("Makefile: introduce CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_AUTO") from -next. What
>>> > do you think Kees?
>>>
>>> Until we sort this out, yes, agreed. Andrew, can you pull the patches?
>>
>> Sure. All these?
>>
>> sh-boot-add-static-stack-protector-to-pre-kernel.patch
>> makefile-move-stackprotector-availability-out-of-kconfig.patch
>
> This one can stay. (It does actually fix another case no one else noticed.)
>
>> makefile-introduce-config_cc_stackprotector_auto.patch
>> makefile-introduce-config_cc_stackprotector_auto-fix.patch
>> makefile-introduce-config_cc_stackprotector_auto-fix-2.patch
>> makefile-introduce-config_cc_stackprotector_auto-fix-3.patch
>
> Yes, these should get dropped for the moment, thanks. Arnd and I have
> been trying to get to the bottom of it.
>
> -Kees
I see this series is repeating apply/drop,
so I am not tracking down the latest status.
When you have a chance for re-spin,
please replace
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -DCONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
KBUILD_AFLAGS += -DCONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
with
KBUILD_CPPFLAGS += -DCONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
