El Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 07:59:42PM +0200 Arnd Bergmann ha dit: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > El Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:11:55PM +0200 Arnd Bergmann ha dit: > >> I see that container_of() has been modified in linux-next and no longer adds > >> the 'const' keyword, do we actually still need the patch? > > > > There is still (at least) the case of const arrays passed to > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE. > > Does the 'const' have any effect there? As it's just an alias, it > should at least > not impact the placement of the symbol in the object file, right? Maybe we can > just remove that 'const' too. Do you see any other instances? For the record: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeyu/linux.git/commit/?h=modules-next&id=0bf8bf50eddc7511b52461bae798cbfaa0157a34 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
