Hi Arnd, 2017-03-15 5:52 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Masahiro Yamada > <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Arnd, >> >> 2017-01-14 0:40 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>: >>> In commit a76bcf557ef4 ("Kbuild: enable -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning >>> for "make W=1""), I reverted another change that happened to fix a problem >>> with old compilers, and now we get this report again with old compilers >>> (prior to gcc-4.8) and GCOV enabled: >>> >>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c: In function 'intel_ring_setup_status_page': >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c:438: error: 'mmio.reg' may be used uninitialized in this function >>> At top level: >>>>> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-maybe-uninitialized" >>> >>> The problem is that we turn off the warning conditionally in a number >>> of places as we should, but one of them does it unconditionally. >>> Instead, change it to call cc-disable-warning as we do elsewhere. >>> >>> The original patch that caused it was merged into linux-4.7, then >>> 4.8 removed the change and 4.9 brought it back, so we probably want >>> a backport to 4.9 once this is merged. >>> >>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Fixes: a76bcf557ef4 ("Kbuild: enable -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning for "make W=1"") >>> Fixes: e72e2dfe7c16 ("gcov: disable -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning") >>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> >> >> >> Applied to linux-kbuild/fixes. > > Thanks! > >> But, please let me ask one question. >> >> When I was checking your commit a76bcf557ef4, >> I noticed the following code: >> >> >> KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-ifversion, -lt, 0409, \ >> $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)) >> >> >> >> It was not clear to me where this comes from >> because it is not the revert of Linus' commit. >> >> >> My best guess is: >> maybe-uninitialized was introduced by gcc 4.7, >> but only reliable for gcc 4.9 or later. >> So it should be disabled for gcc < 4.9 >> >> >> Is this correct? > > Yes. Actually this warning is by definition not reliable, but gcc-4.9 > got a lot better than earlier versions, and the set of false positives > in 4.9 is different from the one in 4.8, which introduced the flag. > As most people have 4.9 or higher, it makes sense to address all > the warnings found by that version by modifying the code (either > fixing bugs or working around false positives), but to just disable it > for 4.8 and earlier. > > In older compiler versions, -Wuninitialized controlled both the > "definitely uninitialized" and the "possibly uninitialized" warnings, > and also had a lot of false positives, but 4.7 and earlier also > prouce lots of other warnings. I try to get a warning free build with > 4.8 and higher but don't even try for old versions at the moment, > though I have an idea for how we could do that too. > Thanks for clarification! -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html